Blog

Jun 09, 2023

Ein Exopolysaccharid

Scientific Reports Band 12, Artikelnummer: 21330 (2022) Diesen Artikel zitieren 3748 Zugriffe 3 Zitate 2 Altmetric Metrics Details Ein eigenartiges Bakterienwachstum wurde sehr häufig bei blattinitiierten Bakterien beobachtet

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 21330 (2022) Cite this article

3748 Accesses

3 Citations

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

A peculiar bacterial growth was very often noticed in leaf-initiated tissue cultures of Sansevieria trifasciata, a succulent belonging to the Asparagaceae family. The isolate left trails of some highly viscous material on the walls of the suspension vessels or developed a thick overlay on semisolid media without adversities in plant growth. FTIR identified this substance to be an extracellular polysaccharide. Various morphological, biochemical tests, and molecular analyses using 16S rRNA, atpD, and recA genes characterized this isolate JAS1 as a novel strain of Agrobacterium pusense. Its mucoidal growth over Murashige and Skoog media yielded enormous exopolysaccharide (7252 mg l−1), while in nutrient agar it only developed fast-growing swarms. As a qualifying plant growth-promoting bacteria, it produces significant indole-3-acetic acid (86.95 mg l−1), gibberellic acid (172.98 mg l−1), ammonia (42.66 µmol ml−1). Besides, it produces siderophores, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase, fixes nitrogen, forms biofilms, and productively solubilizes soil inorganic phosphates, and zinc. Under various treatments with JAS1, wheat and chickpea resulted in significantly enhanced shoot and root growth parameters. PGP effects of JAS1 positively enhanced plants’ physiological growth parameters reflecting significant increments in overall chlorophyll, carotenoids, proline, phenols, flavonoids, and sugar contents. In addition, the isolated strain maintained both plant and soil health under an intermittent soil drying regime, probably by both its PGP and EPS production attributes, respectively.

Endophytes are organisms that reside in and variously colonize their plant hosts. Microbial endophytes are bacterial and fungal entities that reside within plant tissues establishing symbiotic and non-symbiotic relationships with the host, and generally do not impose any negative influence on the host’s growth1,2,3,4. Although newer studies have included pathogens following endophytic lifestyles5,6, many others offer a plethora of growth benefits to the host, more importantly in the bio-availability of mineral nutrients and protection from abiotic and biotic stressors7. Many endophytes also offer key bioresources to agriculturally, medicinally, and industrially relevant products and processes8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Rhizobacteria include various groups of soil-borne bacteria that positively and/or negatively impact plant growth. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) establish rhizospheric and/or endophytic associations with plants exhibited well in some with the formation of root nodules in legumes where they assist the plants in fixing atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia. Root nodulation, however, is not a necessity as many such bacteria colonize within the leaf, stem, root, and even seeds of many legumes and non-legumes19,20. PGP properties of endophytes are understood in their ability to solubilize soil minerals, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, siderophore production, auxin synthesis, etc.21,22. Some microbes are known to fabricate and release, besides other bioactives, certain low to high molecular weight carbohydrate biopolymers called extracellular polysaccharides (EPS). In plant-associated bacteria, EPS secretions enhance (i) their interaction/adherence, movement, and colocalization within the plant systems by forming biofilms; (ii) water retention capacity of soil and host root and (iii) as well in availing other many benefits viz., protecting host(s) from pathogens, substratum/nutrient signaling, and possibly as well plant acclimatization to environmental cues and so on21,23. Many bacterial EPS secretions have seen translations into a range of commercial food, agriculture, biomedical and cosmetic applications with an increasing market value24,25,26,27,28.

Agrobacteria include both plant growth-promoting species and plant pathogens as well, many of which have variously helped plant biotechnologists and molecular biologists. For more than a century, the genus Agrobacterium had witnessed several taxonomic reshufflings, and with currently 14 members, it majors in eight plant pathogens, two nonpathogens, and four that remain yet uncharacterized29. The species Agrobacterium pusense (AP), first isolated from chickpea rhizosphere (NRCPB10T)30, initially sat within the genus Rhizobium but was later shifted to Agrobacterium based on housekeeping DNA barcodes31,32. Newer AP strains have increasingly been reported recently, of which only a few were studied for their PGP assets33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44.

Sansevieria as a genus (maintained in the manuscript hereafter; although very recently sunken into genus Dracaena45), comprises slow-growing succulent plants, commonly referred to as ‘snake plants’ within the family Asparagaceae and include around 70 species of the principally considered ornamentals native to South Africa, South Asia, and Madagascar. They are shade tolerant, can withstand arid, semi-arid, high salt soils, and grow mostly through stolons46. The genus wholesomely amazes plant scientists with the ability to run photosynthesis following the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) which prolongs its oxygen release even in dark, and in being resilient to longer soil dryness, pathogenesis and herbivory as well, all of which also indeed qualify them as perfect indoor and garden ornamentals47,48. Sansevieria fibers have been traditionally used in making ropes, reinforcing material composites, and as fillers, especially for the traditional Nigerian rubber49,50,51. They have been used in suture material for closing intraoral incisions, a practice mentioned variously in the age-old Indian Ayurvedic compendium, the ‘Sushruta Samhita’52,53. Ethnopharmacology supports the use of Sansevieria preparations in various ailments, such as earache, menstrual and labor pains, malaria, and conditions related to the heart, liver, kidney, lung, skin, gastroenteric tract54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62 and also more profoundly as a remedy to snake bites63,64,65,66. Sansevieria trifasciata (ST) has been appraised by NASA for its air pollution-absorption potentials47,67, and other many species in the genus also variously show bioremediation prospects68,69,70,71,72. In addition, numerous phytochemicals and potent bioactives have been identified in many Sansevieria species73,74,75.

Many succulent plants have emerged as hotspots of research primarily focused on their phenomenal resilience to various environmental cues76,77,78,79,80,81. Other investigational leads explore interactions with microbionts which variously augment resilience attributes in these plants82,83,84,85. Research in the genus Sansevieria however witnesses a slow pace in current developments majoring only with its phytochemical73,74,75 and fiber reserves86. Recent literature depicts a recessed trend of investigations especially those warranted on various stressors and mechanisms that allow survivability of Sansevieria plants. Perhaps, studies on microbionts, their interaction, and significance in these plants also remained largely overlooked. The only work to date refers to the isolation of two PGP Bacillus cereus strains from Sansevieria kirkii based on their trimethylamine removal efficiency87. We attempt to fill the lacuna with relevant studies on various succulent plants at our end.

Previously, we reported that relatively higher daytime temperatures effectuate quick whole plant regeneration from in vitro rooted ST leaf explants, and this is remarkably without the exogenous supplementation of any cytokinins88. Other than this, we reckon that many of our tissue culture trials with ST routinely witnessed contamination from a peculiar bacterial growth, forming some highly viscous material on the agar and liquid suspension media. The bacteria however imposed no detriments on the productive regeneration of plants. Our curiosity-driven studies explore various prospects associated with this bacterial isolate, especially in light of the research gaps in Sansevieria outlined before. At the outset, this paper presents the isolation and identification of this bacterium as a novel Agrobacterium pusense endophyte strain, JAS1 from the leaves of Sansevieria trifasciata var. Laurentii. We characterized its in vitro growth patterns, EPS production potential, and PGP traits and also variously document its prospective application in improving both crop and soil health.

Sansevieria trifasciata (var. Laurentii) (= ST) leaves were procured from a rhizome cluster at the botanical garden in Chandigarh University, Mohali (Punjab). All local, national, international guidelines and legislation were adhered while the collection and culturing of ST plants in this study. Surface sterilization and in vitro establishment of ST was followed from our previously reported protocol88. Briefly, one fully expanded healthy green leaf was excised from each plant, cut into 5–6 cm segments, and washed thoroughly under running tap water (30 min), followed by a vigorous rinsing in a mild detergent solution (2–4 drops of Tween-20 in 100 ml tap water) and later clearing with 30 min wash under running tap water. Under the laminar flow hood, the leaf segments were rinsed in Dettol (aq. 1% v/v, 1 min) and cleared with sterile distilled water (SDW) (2 × 5 min washes) followed by sequential treatments with mercuric chloride (0.1% v/v), 70% ethanol (each for 45 s) and a final wash with SDW (3 × 5 min). Trimmed leaf explants (1 cm2) were aseptically transferred to semisolid or liquid (with/without 0.8% gelling agent res.) Murashige and Skoog (MS) media supplemented with sucrose (3%) and various growth regulators. The culture room was set to standard plant tissue culture (PTC) conditions (22 ± 2 °C temperature, 60 to 65% rel. humidity, and 16:8 h’ light/dark photoperiods).

Leaf-initiated ST tissue cultures seen with contamination within 3–4 weeks post-inoculation were normally rejected for endophyte isolation. Long-term (≥ 4 weeks) cultures when exhibiting either a peculiar bacterial ooze (from the sides of the explant and later spreading to the media surface) on semi-solid MS and/or a highly viscous gel-like biomass in liquid MS were selected. A loop-full culture from the selected vessels was streaked over NA (nutrient agar), and MSA (MS-agar) and incubated for 2 days (under PTC conditions). Alternatively, a standard sampling method89 was also used to procure similarly morphed (oozing) colonies from healthy, surface sterile ST leaf segments crushed in ice-cold 1× PBS and inoculating aliquots from the serial dilutions on NA and/or MSA. Single colonies were respectively inoculated over NB (nutrient broth) and MSB (MS broth) for various other methods as well as to facilitate cryo-storage in glycerol (15% in respective MSB and NB).

Biochemical assays such as tests for catalase, methyl red, indole, citrate utilization, Voges–Proskauer, starch hydrolysis, urease, oxidase, nitrate reduction, motility, H2S production, tween 20 and tween 80 hydrolysis, α-ketolactoseThe qualitative utilization, carbohydrate utilization and growth on NaCl were performed with standard protocols described in the manual by Cappuccino and Sherman90. All tests were performed thrice.

All enzyme activity screening assays employed standard methods. For screening cellulolytic (= cellulose degradation) activity, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) agar plates were spot inoculated with the bacterial isolate and incubated for 24 h (at 28 °C) following which media was overlaid with iodine solution. A clear halo zone infers positive cellulolytic activity91. For proteolytic activity screening, the bacterial isolate was spot inoculated on plates with skim milk agar media (Himedia, Mumbai, India) which if develops a clear halo zone around its colony(s) (upon incubation at 28 °C for 24 h) would indicate positive proteolytic activity92. Lipase activity was assayed by spot inoculating the isolate on TBA (Tributyrin agar) base supplemented with 1% Tributyrin (Himedia, Mumbai, India). A positive lipase activity would be inferred from a clear zone around the bacterial colony(s) following an incubation regime of 24–48 h (at 28 °C). Pectinase assay employed inoculating the bacterial isolate over Pectinase Screening Agar Medium (PSAM). Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 2 to 3 days and later flushed with 3–4 ml of iodine solution. A halo zone around the bacterial growth indicates positive pectinase activity93. Amylase activity was screened on starch agar medium (SAM) spot inoculated with the bacterial isolate (and incubated at 28 °C for 1 to 2 days). Plates were flooded with 1% iodine solution for 20 min. A clear yellow zone around the growth indicates positive amylase activity94. Other details on media composition are provided elsewhere (see media and reagents in supplementary file).

The motility test was performed using two standard methods: the semi-solid agar and the wet mount method95. The former used a fine loop to stab bacteria vertically deep into an agar butt (SIM Medium Butt; Himedia, Mumbai, India) which was incubated overnight (at 28 °C) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The other method used a wet mount of bacteria over a glass slide and viewed for growth patterns under a light microscope (Metzer, Vision plus-5000 DPCT). Both methods used fresh inoculums raised from a single colony on NB media.

Antibiotic sensitivity assays for the bacterial isolate used a standard disc diffusion test96 following the CLSI guidelines97. Bacterial starter culture raised overnight from a single colony (in NB, 28 °C, 200 rpm) was spread plated on Muller Hinton agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India). After about 30 min of inoculum soaking, susceptibility discs for various antibiotics (Himedia) were placed on plates and incubated overnight in dark at 28 °C. The observed zone of inhibition was measured as diameters (= extent of bacterial susceptibility to the antibiotic) otherwise depicting antibiotic resistance. Results were expressed as means of the means from three replicates each arriving from three trials per antibiotic assayed. A. rhizogenes strain A532 was used for reference. Antibiotic sensitivity data of the isolate was compared with that reported for AP strain NRCPB10T and MB17-a30,33.

Pure culture of the bacterial isolate JAS1 was sent to MTCC, CSIR-IMTECH, Chandigarh for 16S rRNA sequence-based identification. For further validation, JAS1 genomic DNA was used as a template for PCR amplification of two housekeeping genes, recA (with primers recAF: 5′-ATGGCACAAAATTCTTTGCGTCTCGTAGAG and recAR: TCAVCCTTCGTCACCRTCGCCGTCATCGC) and atpD (with primers atpDF: ATGGCTAAGGCAGCTACCCCMAAGAAAACC and atpDR: TCAGGCAGCYTCGGCAGCCAGCTTCTTSGC). PCR reactions consisted of 200 mM PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol µl−1 each primer (Bioserve Biotechnologies India Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India), 10 mM dNTPs, 5 units of Taq-DNA polymerase (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and molecular biology grade water (Himedia, Mumbai, India) up to 50 µl total volume per reaction. PCR program (run on BIORAD S1000™ thermal cycler) included steps with initial denaturation (5 min, 95 °C) followed by 32 cycles each with intermittent denaturation (1 min, 95 °C), annealing (1.5 min, 60 °C) and extension (1 min, 72 °C); altogether followed with a final extension step (10 min, 72 °C). Amplicons were gel extracted (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and ligated to pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, New Delhi, India) which was then transformed to DH5-α competent bacteria following the heat-shock protocol. Recombinant clones were screened using blue-white screening and validated for inserts using colony PCR and/or restriction enzyme digestions of the plasmids. Plasmid isolates with respective gene inserts were sequenced using universal M13 primers (Eurofins Genomics India Pvt., Bangalore). Sequences were screened and trimmed for vector backbone sequences using the VecScreen tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/) and then analyzed for chromatograms using the CHROMAS software (version 2.6.6, Technelysium Pty Ltd). BLAST for sequence similarity search was carried out with GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and EzBioCloud databases (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/), respectively. Clustal W program was used to align highly similar sequences and MEGA (version 11.0.11, https://www.megasoftware.net/downloads/dload_win_gui) 98 for constructing phylogenetic trees based on various algorithms. All outlined kit-based procedures follow the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Crude EPS was isolated from the oozing spread of JAS1 that developed over 10 days on MSA plates (inoculated with a revived single colony on NA, 28 °C). Drooping volume (~ 10 ml directly from the lid of the inverted plate) was collected into a falcon tube. To ease bacterial separation, crude EPS was double diluted with SDW. Near clear supernatant was resolved after centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 30 min, 4 °C on REMI-CPR-24 PLUS, Remi, Mumbai, India), and further clarified through 0.45 µm filter discs on an ultra-filtration assembly (Tarsons, Kolkata, India). EPS was precipitated with two volumes of ice-cold 100% absolute ethanol and overnight stored at −20 °C. Later, EPS was spool-collected into a fresh falcon tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 30 min, 4 °C). Pellet was left for drying at 60 °C and later mixed in 5–10 ml SDW and dialyzed through cellulose membrane (10–14 KDa MWCO; Himedia, Mumbai, India) for 48 h at constant stirring in 2 l ultra-filtered SDW (at 22 °C). EPS was recovered and lyophilized in a freeze dryer (Allied-Frost, New Delhi, India) to result in a powdered preparation. This was weighed to account for the total EPS recovered from 10 ml of droop collected from the MSA plate. The resulting EPS was also estimated using a standard acid hydrolysis test99. Other than this small-scale EPS production regime used inoculating 50 µl JAS1 starter (overnight raised on NB using a NA raised single colony; 28 °C) in 50 ml MSB in several 250 ml vol. flasks for a month’s incubation (28 °C, 120 rpm). At definite intervals, flasks were removed from incubations and instantly processed for EPS recovery and purification using the same steps outlined before with proportionate volumetric adjustments and stringencies to avoid any volume loss. Freeze-dried weights were measured in respective purifications to account for final EPS yield (w/v) at various day intervals post-inoculation. All tests were repeated thrice and the results were shown as means of the means. These EPS preparations were further used in FTIR analysis and other essays when required. Based on the recovery from small-scale EPS production trials (above), a liter’s scale batch production was attempted in MSB inoculated with 1 ml overnight starter culture of JAS1 (raised from a single colony over NA) in a 5-l Erlenmeyer flask and incubated for 10 days in an orbital shaker (120 rpm, 28 °C on REMI CIS-18plus, Kolkata, India). The whole (highly viscous) culture was doubly diluted with ultra-filtered SDW and centrifuged thrice (10,000 rpm, 30 min, 4 °C) to avail a near clear supernatant (minimizing any possible loss in volume while transfer steps). EPS was precipitated by mixing 2 volumes of ice-cold 100% absolute ethanol followed by overnight incubation at −20 °C. Precipitated EPS was spool-transferred to fresh pre-weighed falcon tubes (50 ml each). Following centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 1 h, 4 °C) the resultant EPS pellet was dried completely in an orbital shaking incubator (45 °C, 150 rpm. 3 days). Total dry weight was measured to account for the w/v EPS yield.

Purified and lyophilized EPS sample (2 mg) was mixed with 200 mg dry KBr, pressed into a 16 mm diameter mold100, and followed with chemical composition analysis by Fourier Transformed InfraRed (FTIR) spectroscopy (on a Spectrum Two FT-IR Spectrometer from PerkinElmer, Mumbai, India) at the Department of Chemistry, Chandigarh University. FTIR spectrum was recorded in the region 4000–400 cm−1 at a resolution of 1 cm−1.

Lyophilized EPS powder was studied for ascertaining its amorphous and/or crystalline nature using X-ray diffractometry101 performed at the UCRD, CU. The diffractogram (Bruker D8 Advance, Mumbai, India) was examined with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation scan ranges of two-theta angles (5°–80°) at RT, 40 kV voltage, and 25 mA current. The crystallinity index (CIxrd) was ascertained using the following standard formula102:

Light microscopy was variously performed using a phase-contrast microscope (Vision plus-5000 DPCT, Metzer, Mumbai, India) for magnified observations of the bacterial isolate to account for its morphological and motility features. Stereomicroscope (Nikon-745T fitted with a 5 Megapixel digital camera, Nikon, Mumbai, India) sufficed in recording stills of plant roots. Surface characteristics of the JAS1 isolate and its produced EPS were analyzed at the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) facility of the University Center for Research and Development (UCRD), Chandigarh University using a standard method103. In brief, for JAS1, a 1 ml aliquot from the overnight grown culture on LB broth was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 5 min on a desktop centrifuge (RM-03 plus, REMI, Mumbai, India). For prefixation, the bacterial pellet was washed thrice in 1× PBS (10 mM; pH 7.2), resuspended in 0.25% glutaraldehyde (in PBS 10 mM, pH 7.2), and incubated for 30 min. Pellet was washed 4 times with SDW and treated with osmium tetroxide (0.1% w/v) for 30 min at RT. Pellet was rewashed thrice with PBS and dehydrated through a series of increasing ethanol concentrations (30–100%; 10 min each). A 10 μl aliquot was processed for imaging. For EPS, a 3–4 mg sample of lyophilized EPS was applied onto a carbon-coated stub and gold-sputtered. Images were recorded at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV on a JEOL TouchScope series (model JSM-IT500, JEOL, New Delhi, India).

To ascertain solubility in different solvents, 5–30 mg of freeze-dried pure EPS was individually mixed with 2 ml of various solvents viz., water, alcohol, acetone, ethyl acetate, methanol, DMSO, chloroform, hexane, butanol, ethanediol, and benzene. The mixture was left on a rotatory mixer for 2 days, centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min, 4 °C), and evaluated on the visual account.

Carrot roots were availed fresh from a village (Gharuan) farm in the close vicinity of Chandigarh University and were followed with standard surface sterilization and bacterization protocol104. In brief, surface sterile 1 cm thin, cross-sectioned root discs were established on NA overlaid with a spread of JAS1 (1 × 104 CFU ml−1) and incubated in a PTC room with standard conditions mentioned before. Root discs were observed for 2 weeks for any pathological symptoms. All trials were performed thrice each with three replicates per trial.

JAS1 isolate was tested for phosphate solubilization using a standard Pikovskaya’s agar plate protocol105 with slight modifications. JAS1 isolate was spot inoculated on Pikovskaya’s agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with tricalcium phosphate as an insoluble P source. The culture was incubated at 28 °C for up to 10 days for the development of a clear halo around the colonies which infer positive phosphate solubilization measurable as an index using the following formula

Qualitative analysis of soluble phosphate was followed using standard methods105,106,107 with some modifications. In brief, JAS1 isolate was cultured in 250 ml flasks with 50 ml of National Botanical Research Institute’s Phosphate (NBRIP) medium (supplementary file). The culture was incubated in an orbital shaker (28 °C, 180 rpm) for 10 days followed with an intermittent assay for soluble phosphates released in the NBRIP medium. Briefly, 2 ml culture aliquots were withdrawn at 48, 120, 160, and 216 hourly intervals and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 10 min). Cell-free supernatant (1 ml) was then mixed well with 2 ml of 1% boric acid and 3 ml of freshly prepared molybdate reagent (supplementary file) and incubated undisturbed (RT, 40 min). Samples were read for OD700 values spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, New Delhi, India). Quantification of available phosphates followed with plotting OD700 values on a standard curve (potassium dihydrogen phosphate in the range of 2–30 µg ml−1). All tests were repeated thrice with four replicates per test.

Production of ACC deaminase by JAS1 isolate was detected with its growth on DF minimal salt medium (supplementary file) supplemented with 2 g l−1 (NH4)2SO4 and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C108.

Screening and evaluation of siderophore production used freshly prepared Chrome Azurol S (CAS) reagent. As per the norm, any trace iron in all culture and test vessels were removed by rinsing them overnight in 3 mol l−1 HCl and washing later with SDW109. Qualitative test for siderophore production followed the standard CAS agar plate method110. Briefly, nutrient agar (NA) plates supplemented with 10% CAS reagent were streaked with the bacterial isolate and incubated at 28 °C for a week. Formation of a yellow to orange halo around the streak infers a positive result. Quantitation of siderophore production used a modified microtiter plate method111. Hundred microliter aliquots were withdrawn from an NB grown culture of the isolate at various time intervals (48, 120, 160, and 216 h), centrifuged (at 10,000 rpm, 10 min), and respectively mixed with 100 µl freshly prepared CAS reagent. After 20 min of incubation, formation of a yellow to orange colored complex in test samples infers a positive siderophore production. The OD630 values of the test samples were recorded on a microplate reader (RT2100C, Rayto, Guangming New District, China). The experiment was performed thrice with four replicates per test. Siderophore production was quantified using the standard formula112:

Here: Ar is the absorbance of reference (uninoculated broth and CAS reagent); As is the absorbance of sample (inoculated broth and CAS reagent).

IAA production was assayed using a standard method113 with slight modifications. Bacterial isolate was cultured in NB supplemented with 0.1% tryptophan and incubated for 10 days (at 28 °C, 120 rpm). Culture aliquots were withdrawn at different time intervals (48, 120, 160, and 216th h) and centrifuged to remove the pellet (10,000 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant (1 ml) was properly mixed with 2 ml of freshly prepared Salkowski reagent (1 ml FeCl3 and 50 ml 35% HClO4)114 and allowed to stand in dark for 30 min. Pink coloration in the test samples infers IAA production which was quantified spectrophotometrically (OD530) using a standard curve for commercially purchased IAA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). All tests were repeated thrice with four replicates per test.

Ammonia production was studied using a standard protocol90. Bacterial isolate was inoculated in peptone water (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and incubated for 10 days (28 °C, 120 rpm). Test aliquots were withdrawn at different time intervals (48, 120, 160, and 216th h) and centrifuged to remove the pellet (10,000 rpm, 15 min), while 1 ml of the supernatant was mixed with 50 µL Nessler’s reagent (Thermofisher Scientific, New Delhi, India). Yellow to brown coloration in test aliquots depicts positive ammonium production which was quantified spectrophotometrically (OD450) using a standard curve for commercially purchased ammonium sulfate (Himedia, Mumbai, India). All tests were repeated thrice with four replicates per test.

GA production by JAS1 was elucidated by employing a standard spectrophotometric assay115. In brief, 2 ml supernatants from culture (at 28 °C, 120 rpm) aliquots were withdrawn at various time intervals (48, 120, 160, and 216 h) after centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 10 min) and mixed with 280 µl of 1 M zinc acetate and later with 280 µl of 10.6% of potassium ferrocyanide solution under vigorous vortexing. Centrifugation (4500 rpm, 10 min) led supernatant was equally mixed (v/v) with 30% HCl (added slowly) and incubated (at RT for 75 min). Absorbance was recorded in a spectrophotometer (OD254) against a blank containing 5% HCl and was fitted to a standard curve for commercial purchased GA (20–200 μg ml−1, Himedia, Mumbai, India).

For the preliminary inference on the zinc solubilization activity of JAS1, a standard plate assay was employed116 that requires spot inoculation of the isolate over a semisolid basal media (supplementary file) mixed with 0.1% zinc oxide (insoluble, Himedia, Mumbai, India) and incubation at 28 °C for a week to observe any clear zones around the spot colony inferring zinc solubilization which can be measured as below

Alternatively, quantification of solubilized zinc in JAS1 inoculated broth (media as above) was performed using a standard Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) method116. Samples were withdrawn at different time intervals (48, 120, 160, and 216th h) and supernatants (10,000 rpm, 15 min) were fed to a Perkin Elmer AAS (Jeeva Labs Pvt. Ltd., Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh).

Potassium solubilization of the bacterial isolate was studied on Aleksandrow agar media (supplementary file) by a standard spot plate assay117 inoculated with a loop-full overnight grown culture and incubated at 28 °C. Clear zones around the colonies confirm positive potassium solubilization. The diameter of clear zones deduced the Khandeparkar’s selection ratio as below:

The nitrogen-fixing ability of the bacterial isolate was verified using a standard method based on the ability of bacteria to grow on nitrogen-free media118. In brief, bacterial isolate was streaked on Jensen media (supplementary file) and incubated (at 28 °C) for a week. The growth of bacteria with glistening colonies and/or streaks on the above media infers positive nitrogen fixation. The test was repeated thrice.

Production of hydrogen cyanide by bacteria was ascertained using a standard method119. Bacterial isolate was streaked over NA plates supplemented with glycine (4.4 g l−1) and was fixed under a suitably sized, autoclaved Whatman filter paper disc (No. 1) freshly soaked in 2% sodium carbonate solution (prepared in 0.5% picric acid). The plates were incubated in dark (at 28 °C for 4–5 days), and when developing a dark orange to red coloration on filter paper, inferred positive HCN production by the isolate. The assay was repeated thrice.

Congo red agar (CRA) method is a qualitative method for screening biofilm formation (BF) ability in microorganisms. Post streak inoculation of the bacterial isolate, CRA plates (supplementary file) were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h. Crystalline blackening of colonies with dry consistency would vouch for the positive bio-film forming by bacteria120.

ST leaf explants were established in jam jars following our standardized PTC protocol88. Post root formation (at 3 weeks after ST explant establishment), a test set of explants were primed with JAS1 (1 × 104 CFU ml−1 raised in NB) while those in control were treated with sterile NB. Cultures were maintained under PTC room conditioning discussed before. Observations were recorded post 5 weeks of JAS1 treatments. The experiment was repeated thrice with five replicates each within the test and control sets.

PGP effects of the isolate were validated experimentally in a controlled glasshouse setting (25–27 °C, 70–90% relative humidity and under natural photoperiods) following a completely randomized design (CRD). Seeds (10 g) of a commercial wheat variety (UNNAT PBW 343) were purchased locally (Grain market, Mohali, Punjab, India) and soaked overnight in 100 ml of ultra-filtered (0.22 μm pore sized, nylon filter paper discs, Millipore, Bengaluru, India) tap water (TW). Seeds were divided into test and control sets (100 seeds each). The test set was primed with 100 ml of TW resuspended JAS1 culture (1 × 108 CFU ml−1; raised overnight from a single colony on NB; 28 °C, 120 rpm, dark). The control set (uninoculated with JAS1) was treated with just the same volume of TW. The seeds (70 numbers per set) were then sown directly (1.0 cm deep) into a soil bedding (prepared with mesh sorted and autoclaved garden soil) layered (soil depth 4 cm) onto plastic trays (43 × 34 × 7 cm). Soil beds were spray watered on the same day post sowing with ca. 150 ml TW, thereafter every day with 50 ml (TW). This included as well booster dosing test soil beds with spray inoculation of JAS1 (50 ml TW with 1 × 108 CFU ml−1) once per week for only initial three weeks while control beds were treated only with 50 ml TW. Seedling growth was monitored and recorded periodically. After 8 weeks, various growth paraments viz., overall fresh and dry weight (FW and DW respectively), and primordial length were compared following soil drain-out. In another similarly designed trial, post 4 weeks’ treatments as in above, soil beds were left unwatered for a week to observe seedling performance under a soil drying regime. Each of the above trials was repeated thrice.

In vitro trials were designed each comprising a test set with three replicates of sterile PTC jam jars each with two surface-sterilized wheat seeds (var. UNNAT PBW-343) established over 50 ml semisolid MSA media carrying 1 ml fresh overlay spread of SDW resuspended bacterial pellet (1 × 104 CFU) derived from an overnight grown starter culture of JAS1. In the control set, the JAS1 spread was replaced with SDW. Culture incubations were done for a month in the PTC room followed by finally recording growth parameters viz., shoot and root length, root branching, and root hair density and length. Standard PTC room conditions were maintained as mentioned earlier. Trials were run thrice following the above experimental regime.

Like in wheat, we also attempted to characterize the PGP effects of JAS1 on a legume crop. For this, seeds of a locally available commercial variety L550 of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) were in transparent plastic pots (1 l) containing ca. 0.7 kg of finely sieved and autoclaved garden soil (as detailed before with wheat tray trial). About 25 g seeds were cleaned for 30 min with two drops of Tween-20 under running tap water followed by three rinses with ample TW. For the JAS1 test sets, seed priming involved imbibing and co-cultivating them together in 100 ml of TW resuspended JAS1 inoculum (1 × 108 CFU ml−1, overnight, 28 °C) raised using an overnight starter culture grown from a single colony (in NB, 28 °C, 120 rpm, dark). Control sets were similarly imbibed in an equal volume of TW (devoid of JAS1). Each of the control and JAS1 treatment sets consisted of five pots (replicates) with three seeds sown per pot. On the 15th day post sowing, a booster dose of JAS1 (10 ml of TW resuspended 1 × 108 CFU ml−1) was applied to each pot (except the control sets which were irrigated with 10 ml sterile TW) following a soil drench method34. All plants were irrigated with 30 ml of TW every third day till the 27th day (3 days before the drain out for final observations of roots). The experiment was repeated thrice with each trial scheduled to run for a month to record the effects on the shoot and root development.

Independent trials were attempted using 150 g of autoclaved and oven-dried garden soil-beddings prepared on plastic plates and drenched with 30 ml of either (i) MSB resuspended overnight grown JAS1 inoculum (1 × 108 CFU ml−1), or (ii) EPS preparation derived by SDW resuspending the dried powdered ethanol precipitate from the centrifuged supernatant of a 10-day MSB grown JAS1 culture (= EPS treatment), or (iii) SDW (= control treatment). The respective plates were left in a laminar airflow hood at 28 °C and the blower speed was set to 0.45 ms−1. Water retention percentage was derived by periodically weighing the plates and evaluating water retained after a periodic water loss in each replicate put under the three different treatments. All experimental trials were repeated thrice with three replicates per treatment.

Tray and pot trials with and without JAS1 priming treatments respectively carried out for wheat and chickpea (see above) were randomly sampled for standard biochemical assays as under.

As per a standard method (referred in121), 100 mg of shoot biomass was thoroughly crushed and mixed with 5 ml of 3% sulfosalicylic acid. From the supernatant retrieved after centrifugation (at 10,000 rpm, 4 °C, 10 min), 2 ml was mixed subsequently with 2 ml of each ninhydrin reagent and glacial acetic acid. This reaction mixture was heated at 100 °C for 1 h and cooled on ice, followed by the addition to it of 4 ml toluene. Brief vortexing and then stilling (15 min) of this mixture developed a light pink chromophore layer, which was retrieved for spectrophotometry (OD520) against a toluene blank. The resulting values were plotted over a standard curve using a commercially purchased proline (Himedia, Mumbai, India) to estimate proline concentration in the test samples.

As per a standard protocol122, 100 mg of shoot biomass was crushed in 2 ml DMSO, and supernatant derived after centrifugation (at 5000 rpm, 4 °C, 15 min) was spectrophotometrically read respectively for chlorophyll a (OD665), chlorophyll b (OD649) and carotenoids (OD480). The resultant concentrations were computed and expressed into mg pigment per gram fresh weight as per recommendations123.

Respective samples of shoot biomass were subjected to air drying (24 h., 35 °C), and from each ca. 200 mg was crushed and mixed with 5 ml of 100% methanol. Supernatants were retrieved post centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 15 min, 4 °C) and stored for further use. Protocols each for phenol and carotenoid estimations observed slight modifications to methods referred elsewhere124. For estimating total phenols, 1 ml of this supernatant from each plant-derived sample and separate 1 ml aliquots each corresponding to a gallic acid standard (ranging from 10–100 µg ml−1) were individually resuspended into 5 ml SDW. Thereafter, 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu's reagent was added to each solution and mixed by shaking. By 5 min later, these were added with 1.5 ml of 20% sodium carbonate with finally volumetric makeup to 10 ml using SDW. Post incubation for 2 h at RT, blue color developed in each reaction vessel which was read spectrophotometrically (OD750). Resultant total phenols in tests were derived from the gallic acid standard plot and were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry biomass. For total flavonoids, as before 1 ml of supernatant from methanol extract of each plant sample and separate 1 ml aliquots, each corresponding to a quercetin standard (ranging from 100 to 1000 µg ml−1) were individually resuspended into 4 ml SDW. To these, 0.3 ml of 5% sodium nitrate was mixed and kept for 5 min at RT. Thereafter, 0.3 ml of 10% aluminium chloride was added to these. Abruptly at the 6th min, 2 ml of 1 M NaOH was added to each of the reactions, all of which then were volumetrically adjusted to 10 ml using SDW. A yellowish-orange color developed in each reaction vessel, which was read spectrophotometrically (OD510). The resultant total flavonoids in tests were derived from the quercetin standard plot and were expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents per gram of dry biomass.

All biochemical assays and experimental trials were performed thrice with at least 3 replicates per test (if otherwise, have been mentioned respective to experiments in relevant sections). The resulting data values for measurements were expressed as means of the three measurements with standard deviations (± standard deviation SD in tables, and/or depicted as error bars in graphs). For DNA barcoding analyses widely used software suits and/or programs and online applications were employed viz., CLC workbench (version 6.5.1), DECIPHER (version 2.19.2)125, VECSCREEN (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/), and NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). FTIR data was analyzed using Essential FTIR® Spectroscopy Software Toolbox (https://www.essentialftir.com/index.html), graphs were prepared in MS excel and panel figures were assembled in MS PowerPoint.

In our aseptic plant tissue culture facility, we routinely attempt callus induction and other whole plant regeneration trials with ST leaf segments. We recently reported a protocol for quick and efficient whole plant regeneration using IBA rooted leaf explants cultured at relatively high-temperature incubations88. In many of these and other trials, alongside the growth of intact callus, callus suspension, and the differentiating meristemoids, we also recorded 5–15% of our culture replicates showing extensive growth of some bacteria. On liquid media (MSB) it exhibited a peculiar highly viscous material sticking to the walls of the PTC vessels (Fig. 1a–c) while on semisolid media (MSA) it showed a distinct oozy bacterial growth (Fig. 1d,e). These did not negatively influence the in vitro plant propagation but favored morphogenesis with more root and shoot primordia over the ST explant (see further). Upon subculture, to MSA the isolate reproduced colonies overgrowing with time which drooped on the lid (Fig. 1f,g). From these instances as well as following a standard endophyte isolation protocol89 over healthy ST leaf segments, we could isolate similarly morphed bacterial clones and scrutinized them variously for their growth, molecular identity, and other characteristics following standard assays (discussed ahead).

EPS secreting bacterial endophyte from ST leaf tissue cultures. ST leaf explants cultured over MSB normally generate callus suspension shown in (a), but also unusually exhibited bacterial growth, which leaves a viscous material receding very slowly from the walls of the vessel upon tilting as shown in (b,c) (indicated with a yellow arrow); On MSA, in (d), a standard ST leaf explant led tissue culture, which often indicated profuse bacterial growth over the agar as in (e) (indicated with arrow); in (f,g) bacterial isolate over MSA produced enormous EPS drooping over the lid with time (plate inverted during incubations). All images represent results from various instances of ST PTC.

Based on the morphological and biochemical characterizations (Table S1, supplementary file) the isolate JAS1 is a gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria and it tested positive for catalase, methyl red, indole, and motility assays. Its ferments various carbohydrate substrates except lactose and gelatin and can limitedly grow in NaCl supplementation of up to 1%. Endophytes are known to produce and secrete various extracellular enzymes which significantly regulate key processes viz., nutrient acquisition, motility, symbiosis, commensalism, pathogenesis, etc. JAS1, however, tested positive only for protease production while remaining negative for pectinase, lipase, cellulase, and amylase. This may supportively hint at JAS1 co-cultivating with ST in vitro without influencing plant growth per se negatively testifying for enzymes known to degrade essential plant cell wall components such as cellulose and starch. It was intriguing otherwise as to why only protease activity could be detected in assays. Literature supports many of the endophytes positive for proteases implicated in equipping with extended antimicrobial defense126. We further plan to explore these effects in JAS1.

Within two days of growth on MSA, the streak plated inoculum of JAS1 formed pale white irregularly shaped colonies with a peculiar bulge or ooze which on further incubation drooped over the petri-dish lid (Fig. 2a,b). Streaks on the NA plate, however, grew to form peculiar fingerlike outgrowths covering the entire media surface within two days post-inoculation (Fig. 2c,d). These projections characterize a multicellularity trait called ‘swarming motility’ witnessed, in some bacteria under certain in vitro conditions of growth127. The motility of JAS1 isolate was priorly confirmed using two standard methods. On semi-solid SIM Medium, it grew along the visible stab line rendering cloudiness in the butt. Alternatively, under light microscopy with wet mounts, swimming motility in discreet directions was evidenced. Oozy growth (as on MSA) is commonly seen with rhizobacteria and is known to effectuate from the synthesis and secretion of certain exopolysaccharide (EPS) complexes. EPS synthesis is influenced majorly by both the concentration and types of sugars and nitrogenous species in the media128 as also witnessed for JAS1 (data not shown). EPS complexes may render such bacteria to develop mucoid (or slimy) and ropy colonies129. JAS1 however indicated only slimy EPS secretion on MSA (Table S1, supplementary file). Hence, the JAS1 isolate showed apparent variability in growth patterns on two different media, which respectively reveal its EPS production and swarming motility features.

Growth characteristics of JAS1 on MSA and NA. In (a–d), dot and streak inoculated JAS1 over MSA (a,b) and NA (c,d). JAS1 in (a) depicts oozy/bulged growth (in 2 days’ culture) which in (b) droops underneath (by the fourth day in upright oriented plates). In (c), JAS1 inoculation develops swarms (in 2 days) which in (d) covers the entire plate by the 3rd day. Panels (e–l) show light microscopy assisted close views of bacterial growth patterns on MSA (only e) or NA (f–l). In (e) shows an EPS front following right after the lane with higher bacterial density, however in (f–l) is shown the growth of JAS1 forming swarms, In (f), shown three superposed layers or fronts with different bacterial (density) patterns, wherein the upper-front with probably the older and excessively denser growth, followed then with the approaching middle-front with newly produced swarms (with spindles pointing outwards, probably yet to form a spiral and wavy swarms), and then the lower-front with well-formed snake-like wavy swarms (with spiral spindles in tufts); Of these the middle front is magnified sequentially (in g–i) to show the quorum spindles. In (j–l), well-formed wavy swarms with spindles (as the lower front in f) when mechanically disturbed show bacteria dislodged from the spindle formation.

Further, under the light microscope the JAS1 growth on both MSA and NA was closely observed (Fig. 2e–l). Compared to that on MSA, where the streak margins always exhibited a peculiar EPS front backed by a population gradient of JAS1 (Fig. 2e), the swarm margins on NA however showed distinguished formations (Fig. 2f). Further on NA, most of the emerging swarm outgrowths appeared exclusively in wavy and/or spiral fashion. Each of the waves or spiral assemblies showed a well-defined length within the swarms (Fig. 2g–i). Freely moving bacteria were more apparent at the swarm fronts than in the back (Supplementary Video 1). Upon disturbing some of the bundled spirals by gently pressing with a fine aseptic needle, which probably dislodged individual bacterium off the spirals (Fig. 2j–l). Dislodged bacteria surprisingly showcased their swimming motility over the area (notched wet) with the pressed agar (Supplementary Video 2). These observations indicate that JAS1 equips both swarming and swimming motility which might be variously showcased in vitro depending on the media composition and substratum factors. Such growth and motility attributes have been shown in many bacteria including as well AP strains38,130. Swarming also exemplifies quorum sensing in bacteria and helps bacteria to variously cling/attach facilitating their easy and speedy escape from local stresses, migration to favored and preferred localities, and/or the efficient invasion of the host127. In some plant-associated bacteria, swarming motility is known to aid virulence while other many are implicated in use as biocontrol agents as they deliver protection to their plant host(s) from other competing bacterial and fungal phytopathogens127. Both swarming and swimming activities facilitate root attachment, and colonization131,132. Answers to how JAS1 orchestrates these features, especially in light of its PGP attributes (discussed ahead) demand further studies.

We performed molecular identification of the bacterial isolate by comparing 16S rRNA, recA, and atpD gene sequences. Partially resolved 16S rRNA sequence (1396 bases) in JAS1 (Genbank accession number MW827601), showed high similarity (99.64%) with the Rhizobium pusense strain NRCPB10T (GenBank accession number NR_116874), followed by Beijerinckia fluminensis strain UQM 1685 (99.43%), Agrobacterium fabrum strain C58 (99.36%), A. tumefaciens strains IAM 12048 (99.13%), and NCPPB2437 (99.00%). The phylogenetic tree revealed close relatedness of JAS1 with recognized Rhizobium pusense strain NRCPB10T (GenBank accession number NR_116874)30 as both share a common ancestor (Fig. 3a). These results confidently position JAS1 within the genus Agrobacterium (considering as well the revised inclusion of Rhizobium pusense strains into agrobacteria)31,32. Further, we deduced the complete sequences of two housekeeping genes (atpD and recA) PCR amplified from JAS1 (GenBank accessions MZ741443 and MZ741444 respectively), and analyzed their phylogenetic relatedness with other known species, after multiple sequence alignment. Based on sequence alignments, atpD in JAS1 could only sparsely relate to a few A. tumefaciens strains (B6, 93.89%; and C58, 93.33%) and R. endophyticum strain (CCGE2052, 91.03%), but surprisingly did not align to any of the reported A. pusense strains. Also, Agrobacterium strains showing maximum sequence similarity were distantly oriented in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3b). In recA (Fig. 3c), JAS1 relates more significantly to many A. pusense strains (CFBP5875, 99.63%; NRCPB10T, 99.54%; LMG25623T, 99.45%; IRBG74, 99.36%; CNPSo 2705, 99.35%; FDAARGOS_633, 99.17%; SX41, 99.17%; MKS-03, 99.16% and strain 76, 99.08% etc.) as well as to A. tumefaciens strains (L2/2/1, 99.79%; 8a, 99.38%; 3b, 99.28%; 175 I-3, 99.17%; and 8 g, 99.07%). Overall, the complete coding sequence of JAS1-RecA did not align completely with any agrobacterial strains. Notably, even with 79% of its sequence coverage, it still could not align identically with the typed strain NRCPB10T (99.54% sequence identity). These results thus largely infer that JAS1 is a novel strain A. pusense which probably had co-evolved with/from other agrobacterial species.

Phylogenetic relationship of JAS1 with closely related bacteria. Evolutionarily related strains shown with neighbor-joining tree based on gene sequences as in (a) for 16S rRNA (1396 bases; partial cds); in (b) for atpD (1455 bases; full cds); and in (c), for recA (1089 bases; full cds). Numbers specify bootstrap values based on 1000 resamplings. Bars in each tree scaled to nucleotide substitutions per position, respectively. Accession numbers are mentioned within braces.

JAS1 was found sensitive to many tested antibiotics (Table S2, supplementary file). In respect to those reported for the A. pusense typed strain, NRCPB10T30, it differed in showing resistance only to ampicillin, and trimethoprim while being susceptible to nalidixic acid, tetracycline, rifampicin, neomycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and spectinomycin.

EPS from various microbial sources have found multifaceted applications133,134 and have been variously studied considering EPS biosynthetic potential of each strain(s) and the influence over it from various parameters viz., physical factors, media components especially the carbohydrate and nitrogenous sources, use of elicitors and so on129,135,136. EPS yield also depends on the extent of its recovery from losses in various downstream extraction and purification processes, all of which vary from simple centrifugation to complex hydrolysis, precipitation, and other recovery steps. At the time of writing the manuscript, no elaborate studies could be found documenting EPS production amongst the known AP strains, except that of a commercial β-glucan (marketed as Salecan) released by the strain ZX09137. Other AP strains were limitedly reported to date with mucoid colonies and/or milky white streaks on agar media.

Our chanceful findings with the strain JAS1 hail from its enormous EPS secretion in PTC media which mandatorily contains 3% sucrose. We manifested a simple approach of diluting the resulting culture volume enough to separate cell biomass using centrifugation followed by ultrafiltration to assure cell-free, near pure extraction. Additionally, to cater to purity requisites in FTIR and SEM (next sections) we further dialyzed and lyophilized EPS preparations. On average, 10 days’ old culture of JAS1 spread plated on 20 ml semi-solid media MSA over a 100 mm diameter petri-dish yielded ca. 56 ± 2 mgs of EPS. Small scaled batch culture in 50 ml of MSB inoculated with JAS1 for 10 days offered a greater EPS yield of ca. 360 ± 2 mg. Surprisingly, however, batch cultures of JAS1 in a liter volume of MSB within the same duration resulted in an averaged total recoverable EPS yield of 7252 ± 2 mg l−1. This is a fairly appreciable yield reported over that known from the AP strain ZX09137 and is also comparable to that from other EPS-producing Agrobacterium species. Yield from the small scale (50 ml) batch correlated well with that resulting from a liter’s scale interpreting an as minimal loss of only about 14 mg during the downstream processing with scaled-up produce.

The functional groups of EPS-JAS1 were studied with the use of ATR-FTIR (Fig. 4a) which depicted an intense broad peak at 3306.21 cm−1 corresponding to the presence of hydroxyl groups138. A small band witnessed at 2916.88 cm−1 unique to that for carbohydrates infers the presence of asymmetric C–H stretching vibration139. Furthermore, an asymmetric stretching peak was observed at 1632.92 cm−1, corresponding to stretching vibrations from carbonyl groups (C=O) in CONH moieties140 and may also interpret ring stretching vibrations in galactose and mannose141. The bands detected at 1416.03 cm−1 detects symmetrical stretching of COO− groups138. The smaller peaks at the 1267.07 cm−1 band are due to C–O stretching vibrations relevant to free carboxylic acids142. Absorption peaks around 800 and 1200 cm−1 would derive from sugars as well as β-glycosidic bonds among their monomers. The absorption peak at 1046.19 cm−1 is designated to C–O–H, C–O–C, and C–O, inferring polysaccharides in the sample140,141,143. The peaks at 895.44 and 815.97 cm−1 correspondingly indicate the α-glycosidic and β-glycosidic bonds144. The small peaks observed at 559.11 and 623.55 cm−1 depict glycosidic linkages in the polysaccharide145. The absorption peaks between 550 and 539 cm−1 match with stretching vibrations of the alkyl-halide groups143.

FTIR, XRD, and SEM analyses. In (a) FTIR of lyophilized EPS released from JAS1 studied in the range of 4000–400 cm−1, In (b) its XRD of EPS, while in (c) SEM micrographs of EPS (in above two and lower left panel) and JAS1 isolate shown bathed in EPS (lower right panel).

The appearance of these functional groups enables JAS1-produced EPS (JAS1-EPS) to find potential use in numerous applications. For example, the water-loving nature of EPS is attributed to the presence of hydroxyls146 which vouches the emulsifying138 or biosurfactant property147 for this EPS. Carboxylate groups ensure affinity to opposite charge molecules such as heavy metals148. The anionic nature and ability to chelate metals and ions ensure anticorrosive effects when applied to metals149. The above findings on functional groups from EPS secreted by JAS1 were found almost similar to those mentioned for exopolysaccharides called curdlan known to be secreted by many bacteria150,151,152. Phase identification of materials is purposefully gathered using XRD. XRD pattern of EPS (Fig. 4b) with broad peaks revealed prominent amorphous nature (83.4%) and sharp narrow peaks depicted low crystallinity (16.6%) profile.

SEM has been used to account for surface characteristics of polymers153. SEM micrographs depict that EPS from JAS1 has both smooth and rough patches at discreet locations on its surface exhibiting as well with irregular folds (Fig. 4c) which may impart compactness to the otherwise dispersive configuration. Small and variously sized pores were also witnessed which (along with folds) may suffice permeability and water-holding features qualifying JAS1-EPS for use in viscosifiers, thickeners, and preservatives for new-age foods154. Porosity may also help bacterial dynamics in plants, soil, and other factors as well within biofilms155,156. JAS1 can be seen as peculiar rods bathing in EPS (Fig. 4c).

Dried exopolysaccharide was found completely soluble in water availing a homogenous and transparent solution with concentration-dependent increments in viscosity. EPS was however found insoluble in other tested solvents viz., ethanol, methanol, butanol, ethanediol; acetone, ethyl acetate, DMSO, chloroform, hexane, and benzene. These results are in congruence with the FTIR results and those reported for EPS known elsewhere, supportive in that its solubility exclusively in aqueous solvent correlates with the predominant hydroxyl groups in EPS157,158,159.

As mentioned before, JAS1 occurred in many of our PTC attempts with ST leaf explants where it did not negatively affect the vegetative growth of ST. However, many species in the agrobacterial genera are reported as plant pathogens while also some exist as symbionts and/or commensals in their host(s). Surprisingly, plant pathogenicity amongst AP strains has only recently been reported from Lawson Cyprus tree isolate, KH1104, known to cause tumors over carrot root discs104. Upon similar tests, JAS1 however failed to indicate any pathological symptoms on carrot root discs. Unfortunately, such pathogenicity assessments have not been made for other known AP strains as also only a few of these are studied for their PGP attributes. Some clinically reported AP strains are also known to cause sepsis in humans160, which warrants safety assessments over proclaimed PGP AP strains, their finished bioproducts (as also on those many known from various other microbes) including as well EPS, many have seen commercial translations with the consideration of generally regarded as safe (GRAS)161. Studies elsewhere as well as ours hint that AP strains may have evolved multiply and independently in natural extremities to showcase either a PGP and/or otherwise a pathogenic behavior.

Phosphate is an important but also most limiting macronutrient in soil, with poor bioavailability to plants due to its insoluble forms mostly occurring as rock phosphates. To quench the deficit, most plants rely on endophytes capable of phosphate solubilization by soil acidification162. JAS1 was detected positive for phosphate solubilization, with a peculiar halo zone developed around its colonies on Pikovskaya’s agar and a phosphate solubilization index (PSI) of 1.27 cm on the 9th day post-inoculation (Table 1). The highest solubilization potential (17.6 µg ml−1) could be achieved within 48 h in liquid NBRIP medium. Like JAS1, another AP strain MB-17a isolated from mung bean roots is also reported with slightly higher phosphate solubilization (PSI of 2.67 cm and solubilization potential of up to 53 μg ml−1 on the 6th day)33, while two other studied isolates from soybean and tomato are reported negative for phosphate solubilization potential38,43.

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is a precursor of ethylene, the phytohormone that under low titers enhances seed germination, root length, and root hair growth163. The successful growth of JAS1 tested over DF media inferred positive ACC deaminase production of (Table 1). This PGP screen evaluates the ability of bacteria to control deleterious ethylene levels allowing their plant hosts to better manage various biotic and abiotic stressors163,164. ACC deaminase is reported in three other AP strains viz., MB-17a, RJG6, and IC5933,34,165.

Siderophores are secondary metabolites with low molecular weight and have iron-chelating potential166. It is involved in growth and development, and in restricting the pathogens proliferating in plants. JAS1 showed a peculiar yellow halo zone around its streaks over CAS agar inferring a positive siderophore production profile, quantifiably of 30.1% (%SU) at the 120th hour of growth (Table 1). Previously, the IC59 strain of AP was reported with siderophore production of up to 30.6% units34 while few others viz., YP3, YP4, MB-17a, and MS-1 strains were reported positive for siderophores40,43.

IAA is an important auxin that principally enhances root growth in plants167. JAS1 displayed appreciable IAA production (max. 86.95 µg ml−1) as determined by the Salkowski assay (Table 1) and is comparable to that in the AP strain MB-17a (reportedly producing 110.5 µg/ml IAA)33. Other reported AP strains such as YP3, YP4 and IC59 produced low IAA (59.2, 43.8, and 21.9 µg ml−1, respectively)34,40, and few others were reported merely as positive for this PGP trait38,40,43.

Ammonia variously sequesters plant growth development by a build-up of soil assimilable nitrogen resources, inhibition of pathogen attack, and biomass production among others168,169. JAS1 was found positively producing ammonia with the maximum release (42.66 ± 0.15 µmol ml−1) detected on the 5th day of assay incubations (Table 1). Only a few other AP strains viz., MB-17a, AM-4, and MS-1 have been tested positive for this attribute.

GA regulates root and stem growth and also improves seed germination in plants170. The highest GA production of 172.98 µg ml−1 was seen by JAS1 at the 120th h of the incubation regime (Table 1). This property has not been ever reported for any AP strain.

Zinc deficiency in plants is considered a critical factor limiting crop productivity. Its sensitivity is more pronounced during drought stress and studies as well suggest that water use efficiency is critically dependent on plants’ zinc profile171. Many soil zinc forms occur in complex with oxides, silicates, and carbonates while microorganisms are reported to augment soil fertility by solubilizing these forms172. Zinc solubilization effect JAS1 was preliminarily ascertained over insoluble zinc oxide in plate and broth assay. In plate assay, a zinc solubilization index of 2.3 cm was recorded at the 216th h of incubation, which continued to increase beyond the observation schedule (Table 1). This apparent finding was also confirmed quantitatively by AAS wherein JAS1 could offer almost 200 μg ml−1 week−1 solubilization of insoluble ZnO. This PGP trait is reported for only one AP strain IHCP2 solely using the plate method inferring a lower solubilization index (1.87 cm)39.

JAS1 failed to detect any potassium solubilization, the latter for which few other AP isolates have been reported positive viz., stains 59, L3/4, OPVS03, and OPVS0637,173,174.

Nitrogen is a vital nutrient for organismic growth. However, plants are unable to utilize atmospheric ample of nascent nitrogen and for the supply of its assimilable forms rely on certain nitrogen-fixing microbes175. N2-fixing bacteria thus can grow over nitrogen-free media in vitro. Our JAS1 isolate showed growth over nitrogen-free Jensen’s media and showcased glistening colonies 7 days post-inoculation (Table 1), thus indicating a positive N2-fixing PGP trait. Similarly, TMV2-6, YP3, YP4, and PR1 strains of AP are also known to confer this ability40,176.

Hydrogen cyanide is a volatile secondary metabolite synthesized by several PGPRs and is implicated as a biocontrol agent causing cytotoxic death of various plant pathogens177. However, the JAS1 isolate did not show HCN production ability. This trait is reported in only a few AP strains34,37,39,43. Recently, a group had shown that HCN production does not necessarily suppress plant pathogens, however, suffices phosphate availability in soil178. Given this, the JAS1 isolate already shows phosphate solubility trait (discussed before) while lacking the HCN production ability. This might suggest that HCN production and phosphate solubilization traits are independently governed in PGPRs, however, this needs extensive studies.

The biofilm formation (BF) property of JAS1 was assayed using the Congo red agar method. The isolated strain JAS1 showed strong BF after 24 h (Table 1) and produced black-colored colonies with a dry consistency. BF could be obviated already during sampling of JAS1 isolate in MSB cultures of ST depicting the biomass aggregates attached to the interior of the flasks forming a thin lining of JAS1 (Fig. 1). This BF is due to the EPS, as generally reported in many plant-associated bacteria which helps in adhesion to plant surfaces, and mitigating various abiotic and biotic stresses23,179,180,181.

We tested the effect of bacterial isolate JAS1 on in vitro rooted ST leaf explants using our previously standardized PTC protocol for ST whole plant regeneration88. After 5 weeks, the JAS1 co-cultivated explants resulted in significantly enhanced shoot and root growth responses (Fig. 5a). In addition, roots in the JAS1 treatments showcased changes in texture from green to pale white (Fig. 5b), significant increments in girth, and lengthier root hairs compared to those in the control treatment (Fig. 5b,c). Roots from field-grown ST, however, did not exhibit these observations (Fig. 5d). These comparisons support that PGP prospects with JAS1 were delivered to its host plant (ST) while it’s standardized in vitro regeneration regime. No pathological symptoms could be recorded in any of the replicates, all of which subsequently resulted in productive whole ST regenerants.

Effects of JAS1 on ST regeneration in vitro. In (a), increments in number of shoot and root primordia; in (b), change in root texture; in (c) root girth and root hair length; and in (d) field grown ST roots. Panels (b–d) show stereomicroscopic views with scaled bars.

We studied the growth performance of wheat seedlings under the effect of JAS1. This used a seed priming approach for a commercial wheat variety which germinated and grew over well-watered tray soil-beds, and was observed all through for 8 weeks. With respect to (wrt) the unprimed seeds in the control sets where shoot emergence was withheld up to the 4th day, the JAS1 treated seeds showed early germination with clear emergence of shoot primordia above the soil within 3 days of sowing (Fig. 6a). Seed germination enhancement is a common prospect of PGPRs probably as also seen here with JAS1. The shoot primordia sustained higher growth increments in lengths wrt those in control throughout the 8-week trials (Figs. 6a,b, 7a–c). Furthering germination, in these trials we observed other various effects from JAS1 that enhanced the wheat seedling developmental profiles. For example, at 5 weeks post sowing, the first leaf easily uncurled and split up from the seedlings (Fig. 7b insets), while this was delayed by ca. 1 week in the untreated control sets. Followed after this shoot in the JAS1 treated beds showed healthy upright stature than those in the control set(s), the latter which with a distinct bent and with older leaves showcasing a peculiar yellowing at their tips extending towards the base, however, without any signs of interveinal chlorosis (Fig. 7b). No such detriments could be recorded in any of the JAS1 treated test sets. Such leaf tip yellowing reportedly corresponds to a temporary nitrogen deficiency in wheat which either entails from the soil low in nitrogen and/or often its waterlogging182. Obviously, throughout these experimental trials, soil profiles were maintained equally well-watered and in addition, no seepage was provisioned. It is also to note that the soil beds with JAS1 primed seeds were booster dosed intermittently thrice. In addition, soil testing also indicated wheat-productive improvement of its fertility by JAS treatment (data not shown). This supports the successful translation of the PGP attributes of JAS1 in improving both soil and plant health. Data recorded post drain-out inferred that JAS1 treatment enhanced shoot and root biomass (Fig. 6c,d), and their lengths (Fig. 6e,f). In addition to this, comparative speculation of the root formations revealed that almost all roots in the JAS1 treatments had more branching points than on those in the untreated set (Fig. 7d), as well as that root branching is evident even at sites closer to the pod or that lay closer to topsoil profile (Fig. 7d,e). When observed under a stereomicroscopic magnification, roots from seedlings in the JAS1 treatment showcased denser and lengthier root hairs than those in the control treatments (Fig. 7e). Soil particles also adhered better to the roots under JAS1 treatment (Fig. 7d,e). Presumably, they form aggregates on the rhizosheath due to the viscous EPS secretion by JAS1 as also shown with many other rhizobacteria183. Enhanced branching, hair length, and density in roots are also established outcomes of PGPR application in plants.

Effect of JAS1 on ex vitro grown wheat seedlings. In (a,b), seedling emergence and shoot growth estimates respectively as length increments recorded with time. Data on wheat growth profiles shown in (c–f) derived post drain-outs at the end of 8 weeks’ trial(s). Length measured from root shoot interface adjoining the pod. Datasets represent the means of the means from three trials.

PGP effects of JAS1 observed on ex vitro grown wheat. All figures on the left represent control treatment while those on right correspond to JAS1 treatment trials. Shoots in (a) at 3 weeks; in (b) at 8 weeks (in insets at 5 weeks) post sowing. In (c), seedling profile post drain out after 8 weeks growth over well-watered soils. In (d), prominent root branching under JAS1 treatment, which in (e) shown well distinguished at close to the root-shoot interface. Also, in (e) prominent increments in root-hair density and length under JAS1 treatment. Roots in seedlings under JAS1 treatments exhibit soil aggregates eroding from the roots on swirling the plate (as in d), otherwise remain attached (as in e).

While maintaining the above experimental design we also separately tested the effect of intermittent soil drying over JAS1-treated seedling growth. Watering of soil beds was completely withheld post 6 weeks of sowing for 10 days. We witnessed gradual leaf squinting and drooping in shoots in the control sets (Fig. 8a) as opposed to their normal growth in the same period under well-watered regimes. Shoots in the JAS1 treatment trays however maintained their overall growth stature at all times till the 10 days (Fig. 8a). Upon rewatering most seedlings in the control sets could not regain the healthy stature but wilted while those in JAS1 treatment continued to propagate normally without any signs of growth detriments (data not shown). In addition to this, we also noted a peculiar soil cracking phenomenon, usually witnessed in farm fields under conditions of drought. Close speculation of the tray trials depicted that soil beds with JAS1 treatment had developed comparatively lesser cracking extent than the beds in the control treatment (Fig. 8b). These results indicate that JAS1 treatment of wheat could rescue plants from intermittent soil drought. EPS releasing PGPRs are known to protect plants from drought tolerance by the formation of rhizosheath around the roots and as well by enhancing the soil water uptake183,184.

Effect of JAS1 on plant and soil health under a dry regime. In (a) wheat seedling performance, and in (b) the extent of soil cracking developed after 10 days’ soil drying. In (c) effect of JAS1 and its EPS over soil water retentions at periods under steady soil drying regime.

These notions warranted testing the effect of JAS1 and its EPS on soil water retention. Soil beds prepared in plastic Petri-dishes were completely drenched with either MSB resuspended JAS1 pellet or water resuspended EPS or just water and were followed with a continuous drying regime. Under these trials, water-drenched soil beds showed complete drying within a week (Fig. 8c), however at this time point soils in the EPS and JAS1 treatment dishes still retained ca. 8% and 16% water and with their complete drying scenes delayed to ca. 11th and 13th day, respectively. These results indicate that JAS1 is effectively able to enhance water retention of soil and that water-soluble EPS released by JAS1 could be the possible governing factor. Soil cracking extent was well reduced in JAS1 and EPS treatment than in control treatment (data not shown).

These results support our notion of reduced soil cracking effect in JAS1-dosed soil beds. Higher water retention in JAS1 treated soil bed wrt that with EPS treatment was obviously due to the presence of MSB supportive to JAS1 growth and EPS secretion. The presence of MSB may be analogous to the presence of wheat plants in tray trials which might accordingly govern growth and EPS release in soil beds from JAS1 (dosed actually as water resuspended inoculum). Besides, positive growth and EPS secretion in JAS1 on agar solely supplemented with extracted ST, wheat biomass, and/or coconut water were also verified from other ongoing studies (data not shown). JAS1 growth and/or productive EPS release in soil beds otherwise treated exclusively with water-resuspended inoculum was negligible (data not shown).

The water solubility of the EPS may allow its expansive reach, deposition, and coverage as well as that of the releasing bacteria also abreast by various other mechanisms (bacterial swimming and swarming motility) to other portions within the soil profile. The ability of such bacteria to proliferate, within roots and/or on rhizoplane would allow extended cushioning besides the other PGP effects delivered consistently to the plant host, especially under abiotic stresses such as drought. In bigger field settings, how this may translate into crop productivity, and soil performance, otherwise also under various stressors is yet under testing for JAS1 (data not shown). Many PGP bacteria are already in commercial use as bioinoculants and biofertilizers185,186,187,188.

To correlate with the PGP effects of JAS1 in tray trials (discussed above), we also attempted it’s in vitro co-cultivation with surface sterile wheat seeds, established for a month on MSA in PTC jam jars (Fig. 9a,b). As expected, wrt that in controls, profound lengthening of shoots (Fig. 9c), roots (Fig. 9d), and an apparent increase in root branching (Fig. 9e) were evident. Other than these, bacterization also enhanced root hair growth both in its length and density (insets in Fig. 9e) as also seen respectively with tray trials. The root branching effect from JAS1 (in vitro), however, was prominent throughout the length on lateral (feeder) roots (Fig. 9e) as opposed to the lateral root branching points occurring immediately close to the root-shoot interface (in tray trials). These prominently branching feeder roots themselves appeared hovering over the culture media surface and rarely penetrating the media themselves except for their new branch outgrowths and otherwise also the primary roots (Fig. 9a,b,e). This may seek its support in that feeder (lateral) roots could be affinitive to EPS secreted readily by JAS1 overgrowing on the upper media profile (Fig. 9b) wrt control (Fig. 9a). Also, possibly branching could hail from the high IAA (biosynthesis from JAS1 as shown before) released along with the EPS. Other than these, gradually expanding EPS overlay on the media surface obviates more surface fluidity offering lesser relays, especially to the extending roots in agar (compared to that understandable with 0.8% gel strength or compactness).

PGP effects of JAS1 over in vitro wheat seedlings. In comparison to (a) the uninoculated control trial, (b) JAS1 co-cultured with wheat seedlings shown in a jam jar (note the hazy EPS secretion over media with JAS1 overlay) increased wheat (c) shoot length; (d) root length; (e) root branching (indicated with yellow arrows), and root hair length and density (insets in e with small bars scaled to 0.5 mm). Figures representing results from three independent trials.

In the case of tray trials, such compactness would be drastically higher in silica-contained soils, the latter which also contracts during soil drying phases showcased with the cracking phenomenon (Fig. 8b). In such scenarios, feeder roots might prefer extending more at the upper gel (and analogously also in topsoil) profile than traversing steep depths provided EPS overlaying is provisioned from JAS1. More prominent length enhancement and branching frequency in these feeders would allow for easy and quick acquisition of readily available surface water and dissolved nutrients in the substratum, especially in the topsoil profile. More branching on the surface localized feeder roots would also alternatively be considered with the substratum type and inoculum density in overlay and space limits under in vitro trials, while in ex vitro tray trials root branching on sections nearing the shoot–root interfaces or more appropriately the topsoil profile could effectuate much proportionately possibly due to locally higher IAA sequestration following the booster dosing of JAS1 hence, it may obviate higher PGP effects of the endophytes localized in this region. A better shoot growth would corroborate in light of the above effects on root and/or other PGP activities in the root, soil, and whole plant delivered by the endophyte, its EPS, and/or both189. Additional growth enhancement from JAS1 treatment in contrast to control sets seen on in vitro wheat seedlings propagated over a widely used plant-specific MS media composition would thus vouch for the positive PGP properties sufficed by JAS1.

Like in wheat we uncovered similar PGP effects of JAS1 upon trials also with a commercially grown legume crop, chickpea. JAS1 treatments offered significantly better growth, witnessed in the higher shoot length increments compared to plants in the control sets (Fig. 10a,b). This effect was evident right after two days from the sowing date and the trend (higher shoot length in JAS1 than in controls) remained consistent till the end of the experiment (Fig. 10a). Within about 15 days post sowing, shoots (in sets under JAS1 treatment) were seen with an averagely doubled length than those in the control treatment (Fig. 10a,b). JAS1 led growth enhancement was also evident with the roots which reached the bottom of the pot more rapidly (in almost all pots wrt control; Fig. 10c). Both these effects correlate with those seen with JAS1 trialed over wheat and could hence be more supportively attributed to the positive PGP effects of JAS1 (assayed biochemically before). As surmised from Fig. 10d, where a scoop was randomly taken from the top soils (from pots under trials respectively on the 30th day while the watering regime was halted beforehand on the 27th day), JAS1 treated soils remained moist even after the end of the watering regime (tightly held soil particles maintaining the scoop shape) as compared to the dried-out control soils (loosely held soil which could not maintain the scoop shape). Justifiably, JAS1 could productively synthesize EPS (as already assayed and shown before) while being attached to plants throughout the trial (as well as when applied with a booster dose) and helped the soil by retaining enough water. Observations post soil drain-out (Fig. 10e,f) suggest significant changes to root architecture in JAS1 treated chickpea wrt the control treatment. Comparatively, most of the roots under JAS1 treatment (except the primary) were slightly thinner (Fig. 10e,f), however, primary root length (Fig. 10e), as well as both secondary roots’ number and length, exhibited significant increments (Fig. 10e). Additionally, as seen in other plant trials (Figs. 5, 7, and 9), JAS1 treatment with chickpea also offered a substantial increase in root hair density and length (Fig. 10f, magnified root mid-sections in upper panels and sections close to and including the tip). Nodule formation, however, could not be seen in any chickpea replicates in any of the trials as opposed to that reported to effect with an IC59 strain of AP34.

Ex vitro PGP effect of JAS1 on chickpea. (a) Trend with enhanced shoot development in height, bar measures 10 cm; (b) representative specimens with an increase in height comparative to that in control, bar measures 10 cm; (c) roots’ reach to the pot bottom; (d) scoop of soil from control and compared to JAS1 treated soil showing apparent water retention in effect from JAS1 at 30th day post sowing; (e) effect on secondary root development, bar measures 5 cm; and (f) effect on root hair density and length as seen under a stereomicroscope, bars measures 500 µm. Effects and measurements shown in (b–f) (except d) correspond to recordings made on the 15th day-day post-sowing.

To validate growth enhancement in both wheat and chickpea seedlings under independent treatments with JAS1, changes in the standard physiological plant growth parameters viz., total chlorophylls, carotenoids, proline, phenols, flavonoids, and sugars were analyzed (Fig. 11). Overall chlorophyll content was significantly enhanced by 50.03% and 61.71% in JAS1 treated wheat and chickpea seedlings, respectively. Chlorophyll a and b contents were also shown to increase in both wheat (69.65% and 69.56% res.) and chickpea (150.64% and 67.19% res.). Similarly, wrt the control treatments, JAS1 affected significantly enhanced total carotenoids in wheat (8.35%) and with a drastic increase in chickpea (42.98%). Such enhancements in the photosynthetic pigments’ profile would understandably corroborate to overall productive physiology in plants190. Proline is an amino acid and a key osmolyte that offers macromolecular stability to organellar structures, signal factors, enzymes, and membranes within the cells and is vital to various housekeeping tasks such as redox balancing for stress adaptations191,192. JAS1 treatment significantly enhanced total proline content in both wheat (74.6%), and chickpea (27.03%). Phenols protect plants under abiotic stressors by deactivating ROS and effectuating anti-oxidation193, and as such total phenols’ content was witnessed significantly incremented in both wheat (25.23%) and chickpea (22.98%) under JAS1 treatment as compared to controls. Nonetheless, total flavonoids as well increased in wheat (57.68%) and chickpea (61.47%) under JAS1 treatments. These include specialized secondary metabolites which accumulate to counteract various plant stresses194. Enhanced physiological profiles under PGPR treatments would well verse the plants’ photosynthetic performance, which should interpret an increase in total leaf sugar content195, as significantly accounted in both wheat (53.89%) and chickpea (48.02%) under JAS1 treatments. Sugar accumulation also fosters osmoregulatory requisites in plants, especially under stress196.

Biochemical estimates of plant growth under ex vitro treatment with JAS1. Data for both wheat and chickpea show the total available chlorophyll, carotenoids, proline, phenols, flavonoids, and soluble sugar profiles. Each dataset represents means of the means of three independent experiments each with randomly sampled 5 replicates respectively from control and JAS1 treatments. Values for phenols and flavonoids are relative to their gallic acid and quercetin equivalents, respectively.

Taken together, these (Fig. 11) and the outcomes from various plant treatments (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) support the assayed PGP credentials (Table 1) of the novel AP strain, JAS1, while its EPS production attribute either exclusively improves soil health by optimizing water retention, reducing desiccation-cracking (Fig. 8b,c); and/or also, understandably by virtue of the PGP activities, that contribute to soil health variously via mineralization, ammonification and other processes.

We show that JAS1 priming enhances the root branching and root hair density in ST, wheat, and chickpea. Root hairs appear as single tubular cells, commissioned for upsizing the rhizospheric area and thereby enhancing water and mineral uptake. They are the preferred sites for entry and colocalization by PGPRs, deeming particularly advantageous for plants thriving in low phosphorus soils197,198,199,200. Rock phosphates are insoluble and hence immobile components in soil and pose a criticality for plants by being such in a non-assimilable form of the microelement. Some plants secrete exudates to acidify soils and solubilize such phosphate forms201 and/or otherwise recruit their phosphate solubilizing endophytes for this202,203,204. Many of these endophytes also concomitantly ease nutrient acquisitions in plants by productive remodeling of root architecture and its development viz., growth in size and number of roots, their branching, and root hairs202,205,206,207,208. We glimpsed JAS1 colocalizing in root hairs of JAS1-primed PTC-raised ST explants (Supplementary Video 3) and intriguingly are exploring its transmissibility further up beyond the root-shoot interface (data not shown). Nonetheless, root hair length and density may correlate positively to high auxin content in the root tip, the latter has been shown recently to stimulate Arabidopsis growing over high Cd and As soils209. As shown, JAS1 delivers phosphate solubilization, and high IAA content and enhances root hair length and density besides other root growth parameters (see sections with ST, wheat, and chickpea treatments with JAS1). Surprisingly, by a mechanism yet unknown, ST roots are reported to show a high absorption and low translocation of soil Cd70. Possibly PGP endophytes contribute to this and the above features in such plants by eliciting auxin levels210. Reckoning that Sansevieria succulents can survive well in low fertility soils and bear the dexterity to withstand various biotic and abiotic cues, presumably endophyte(s) like JAS1 and others may suffice it and other Sansevieria species in sustenance as resilient succulents.

This manuscript stands as the first report on the isolation of a novel AP strain, JAS1, from the genus Sansevieria and as the second to any reported successful attempts on isolation, characterization, and bioprospecting of any bacterial endophyte(s) from Sansevieria plants. The first study reported a PGP (IAA producing and ACC deaminating)-cum-TMA resistant bacterial endophyte, Bacillus cereus strain EN1, isolated from S. kirkii, which was shown to enhance the TMA removal potential of its host87. In our study, the JAS1 strain of AP (isolated from ST) tested positive for multiple PGP properties, besides also for enormously producing EPS. As depicted by various morphological and physiological parameters, JAS1 leads to growth enhancement in wheat and chickpea seedlings, as also apparent in its priming trials with the ST host. Besides plants’ growth requisites, water is essential for soil dexterity to enable mineralization, bio-fertility processes, and productive microbial dynamics within it. Conventional cropping systems have always faced the dilemma of low irrigated soils due to uneven rainfall, quick water seepage down to the underground table, and only a small fraction of it is available to crops and for a limited time, especially in sandy soils and/or areas under drought. Under an intermittent soil drying regime, JAS1 and its EPS could minimize desiccation-cracking by enhancing soil water retention. This presumably also rescued and rejuvenated wheat seedlings from drought stress. These multitudes of attributes in JAS1 which collectively improve both plant and soil health are summarized in a compelling infographic (Fig. 12). Bioprospecting of PGP endophytes isolated from Sansevieria and other succulent plants would prove a boon as newer bio-inoculants for improving commercial crop and soil performances. Other than these, heightened production of bioactives like EPS in these endophytes would allow considering cost-effective alternatives for industries relevant to its plethora of applications.

A compelling view of JAS1’s prospects: PGP properties (shown in grey boxes on the right) JAS1 (shown as yellow rods) positively influence shoot and root growth parameters (positive influences without JAS1 treatment shown with green arrow-heads, yellow for control treatment) as well as by its EPS production enhance soil water holding capacity and negates soil cracking, a usual symptom of low soil moisture which variously impacts plant performance and soil microflora. Water retention and soil holding capacity would also be greatly enhanced with a JAS1-induced increase in root branching, root hair length, and density especially in the topsoil region, thus collectively obviating enhanced and prompt absorption of minerals and growth-related materials from the soil. JAS1 and its secreted EPS may work (as other PGPRs) to enrich the soil micro and macroflora by restricting and allowing the growth of pathogenic invasive microbes and attracting other species with symbiotic interests.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. All deduced nucleotide sequences in the bacterial isolate corresponding to its 16S rRNA, recA and atpD genes were deposited in NCBI’s GenBank (with publicly available accession numbers MW827601, MZ741443 and MZ741444, respectively).

Schulz, B. & Boyle, C. Microbial Root Endophytes (eds. Schulz, B.J.E., Boyle, C.J.C. & Sieber, T.N.). 1–13 (Springer, 2006).

Hardoim, P. R., Van Overbeek, L. S. & Elsas, J. D. V. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 16, 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Etesami, H. & Maheshwari, D. K. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 156, 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.013 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Vigani, G. et al. Root bacterial endophytes confer drought resistance and enhance expression and activity of a vacuolar H(+) -pumping pyrophosphatase in pepper plants. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14272 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Hardoim, P. R. et al. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00050-14 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Compant, S. et al. The plant endosphere world–bacterial life within plants. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 1812–1829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15240 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Sagar, A., Yadav, S. S., Sayyed, R. Z., Sharma, S. & Ramteke, P. W. Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology: Plant Stress Tolerance, Bioremediation, and Bioprospecting (eds. Tofazzal Islam, M., Rahman, M. & Pandey, P.). 561–580 (Springer, 2022).

Raimi, A. & Adeleke, R. Bioprospecting of endophytic microorganisms for bioactive compounds of therapeutic importance. Arch. Microbiol. 203, 1917–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02256-z (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jain, P. & Pundir, R. K. Endophytes: Biology and Biotechnology. Vol. 15 (ed. Maheshwari, D.K). 145–169 (Springer, 2017).

Vaishnav, A., Shukla, A. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, R. & Choudhary, D. K. Endophytic bacteria in plant salt stress tolerance: current and future prospects. J. Plant Growth Regul. 38, 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9880-1 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Triplett, E. W. Diazotrophic endophytes: Progress and prospects for nitrogen fixation in monocots. Plant Soil 186, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035052 (1996).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Latha, P., Karthikeyan, M. & Rajeswari, E. Plant Health Under Biotic Stress (eds. Ansari, R., Mahmood, I.). 1–50 (Springer, 2019).

Khare, E., Mishra, J. & Arora, N. K. Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Strobel, G. A. Endophytes as sources of bioactive products. Microbes Infect. 5, 535–544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01538 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Zhu, H., Liu, L., Lin, J. & Tang, K. A review: Recent advances and future prospects of taxol-producing endophytic fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86, 1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2546-y (2010).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Sharma, P. & Kumar, S. Bioremediation of heavy metals from industrial effluents by endophytes and their metabolic activity: Recent advances. Biores. Technol. 339, 125589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125589 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yu, H. et al. Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 165, 437–449 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Adeleke, B. S. & Babalola, O. O. The plant endosphere-hidden treasures: A review of fungal endophytes. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 37, 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2021.1991714 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dent, D. & Cocking, E. Establishing symbiotic nitrogen fixation in cereals and other non-legume crops: The greener nitrogen revolution. Agric. Food Secur. 6, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-016-0084-2 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Aguilar, A. et al. Analysis of genome sequence and symbiotic ability of rhizobial strains isolated from seeds of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). BMC Genomics 19, 645. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5023-0 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Santoyo, G., Moreno-Hagelsieb, G., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M. & Glick, B. R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 183, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lacava, P. T., Bogas, A. C. & Cruz, F. D. P. N. Plant growth promotion and biocontrol by endophytic and rhizospheric microorganisms from the tropics: A review and perspectives. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.796113 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Sayyed, R. Z., Patel, P. R. & Shaikh, S. S. Plant growth promotion and root colonization by EPS producing Enterobacter sp. RZS5 under heavy metal contaminated soil. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 53, 116–123 (2015).

CAS Google Scholar

Chaudhari, V. et al. Therapeutic and industrial applications of curdlan with overview on its recent patents. Front. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.646988 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Qi, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, J., Bulte, J. W. M. & Dong, W. Oral administration of salecan-based hydrogels for controlled insulin delivery. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 10479–10489. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02879 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mohd Nadzir, M., Nurhayati, R. W., Idris, F. N. & Nguyen, M. H. Biomedical applications of bacterial exopolysaccharides: A review. Polymers 13, 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040530 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xu, L. & Zhang, J. Bacterial glucans: Production, properties, and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 9023–9036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7836-6 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ventorino, V. et al. Bioprospecting of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria from different natural ecosystems for biopolymer synthesis from vinasse. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 6, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0154-3 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Flores-Félix, J. D., Menéndez, E., Peix, A., García-Fraile, P. & Velázquez, E. History and current taxonomic status of genus Agrobacterium. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 126046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.126046 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Panday, D., Schumann, P. & Das, S. K. Rhizobium pusense sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 61, 2632–2639. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.028407-0 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Mousavi, S. A., Willems, A., Nesme, X., de Lajudie, P. & Lindström, K. Revised phylogeny of Rhizobiaceae: Proposal of the delineation of Pararhizobium gen. nov., and 13 new species combinations. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 38, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.12.003 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Oren, A. & Garrity, G. M. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 4299–4305. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001149 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Chaudhary, T., Gera, R. & Shukla, P. Deciphering the potential of Rhizobium pusense MB-17a, a plant growth-promoting root endophyte, and functional annotation of the genes involved in the metabolic pathway. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.617034 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, S., Srinivas, V., Vemula, A., Samineni, S. & Rathore, A. Influence of diazotrophic bacteria on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth promotion and yield traits in five cultivars of chickpea. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 15, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.05.006 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Ali, A., Khalid, R., Safdar, A., Akram, Z. & Hayat, R. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Br. Microbiol. Res. J. 6, 32. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2015/14496 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Krishnamoorthy, R. et al. Characterization of phyllosphere methylotrophic bacteria isolated from the groundnut and their impact on growth, yield and quality of the kernel. J. Environ. Biol. 41, 600–606. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/41/3/MRN-1193 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Abdollahi, S., Golchin, A. & Shahryari, F. Lead and cadmium-resistant bacterial species isolated from heavy metal-contaminated soils show plant growth-promoting traits. Int. Microbiol. 23, 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-020-00133-1 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

de Almeida Lopes, K., Carpentieri-Pipolo, V., Oro, T., Stefani Pagliosa, E. & Degrassi, G. Culturable endophytic bacterial communities associated with field-grown soybean. J. Appl. Microbiol. 120, 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13046 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mir, M. I., Kumar, B. K., Gopalakrishnan, S., Vadlamudi, S. & Hameeda, B. Characterization of rhizobia isolated from leguminous plants and their impact on the growth of ICCV 2 variety of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Heliyon 7, e08321 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bergottini, V. M. et al. Bio-inoculation of yerba mate seedlings (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hill.) with native plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: A sustainable alternative to improve crop yield. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51, 749–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1012-5 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hernández, I. et al. Endophytic rhizobia promote the growth of Cuban rice cultivar. Symbiosis 85, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-021-00803-2 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gnangui, S. L. E., Kouagdo, C. & Zeze, A. First report of Rhizobium pusense within Voandzou (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) rhizosphere in Côte d’Ivoire. Microbiol. Nat. 1, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.26167/CZTB-1P42 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Singh, M., Kumar, A. & Pandey, K. Biochemical and molecular identification of Solanum lycopersicum L. temperature tolerant bacterial endophytes. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 22, 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101409 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Patel, J. K., Agrawal, R. & Sidhdhapara, R. Root associated bacterial endophytes from Poaceae plants: Identification, characterization and plant growth promotion. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 10, 478–483. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2020.10.3.478-483 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Takawira-Nyenya, R., Thiede, J. & Mucina, L. New nomenclatural and taxonomic adjustments in Dracaena (Asparagaceae). Phytotaxa 524, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.524.4.5 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Hessayon, D. G. The House Plant Expert. (Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 1996).

Boraphech, P. & Thiravetyan, P. Removal of trimethylamine (fishy odor) by C3 and CAM plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 11543–11557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4364-3 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kim, K. J. & Lee, D. W. Efficiency of volatile formaldehyde removal of orchids as affected by species and crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) nature. Horticult. Environ. Biotechnol. 49, 132–137 (2008).

CAS Google Scholar

Osabohien, E. Effects of epoxidation on the thermal conductivity and equilibrium swelling properties of bowstring hemp fibre natural rubber composites. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 169–176 (2009).

Google Scholar

Osabohien, E. & Egboh, S. Utilization of bowstring hemp fiber as a filler in natural rubber compounds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107, 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.27012 (2008).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sreenivasan, V. S., Rajini, N., Alavudeen, A. & Arumugaprabu, V. Dynamic mechanical and thermo-gravimetric analysis of Sansevieria cylindrica/polyester composite: Effect of fiber length, fiber loading and chemical treatment. Compos. B Eng. 69, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.025 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kamath, S., Sharma, M., Ravishankar, B. & Mundugaru, R. In-vivo study of tissue reaction to Crotalaria pallida and Sansevieria roxburghiana fibers. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 8, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2016.12.002 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Lambade, P. & Thorat, A. Efficacy of Murva (Sansevieria roxburghiana Schult. and Schult.f.) as a suture material in closure of incisions in third molar surgeries: A prospective study. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 8, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_42_15 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Pujol, J. Naturafrica—The Herbalist Handbook. (0-520-1514B-X, 1990).

Takawira-Nyenya, R., Newton, L. E., Wabuyele, E. & Stedje, B. Ethnobotanical uses of Sansevieria Thunb (Asparagaceae) in coast province of Kenya. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 12, 51–69 (2014).

Google Scholar

Cheruiyot, K. et al. Ethnobotanical survey and plant monographs of medicinal plants used among the Elgeyo community in Kenya. J. Ethnobiol. Tradit. Med.-Photon 120, 633–649 (2013).

Google Scholar

Srichaikul, B. et al. The therapeutic and clinical drug review of Thai traditional herbal remedies extracted from ancient Thai medicinal manuscript volume no. 3 of palm leaf scriptures. Adv. Nat. Sci. 5, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ans.1715787020120501.1037 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Rajalakshmi, P., Pugalenthi, M. & Vadivel, V. Traditional knowledge on medicinal plants used by the Irula tribe of Kadambur Hills, Erode district, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Med. Plants 4, 14–17 (2016).

Google Scholar

Ikewuchi, C. C., Ayalogu, E. O., Onyeike, E. N. & Ikewuchi, J. C. Study on the alkaloid, allicin, glycoside and saponin composition of the leaves of Sansevieria liberica Gérôme and Labroy by gas chromatography. Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 12, 367–373 (2011).

Google Scholar

Ayyanar, M. & Ignacimuthu, S. Plants used for non-medicinal purposes by the tribal people in Kalakad Mundan-Thurai Tiger Reserve, Southern India. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 9, 515–518 (2010).

Google Scholar

Muthukumarasamy, S., Mohan, V., Kumaresan, S. & Chelladurai, V. Traditional medicinal practices of Palliyar tribe of Srivilliputhur in Antenatal and Post-natal care of mother and child. Nat. Prod. Radiance 3, 422–426 (2004).

Google Scholar

Padal, S., Ramakrishna, H. & Devender, R. Ethnomedicinal studies for endemic diseases by the tribes of Munchingiputtu Mandal, Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Med. Aromatic Plants 2, 453–459 (2012).

Google Scholar

Kokwaro, J. O. Medicinal Plants of East Africa (University of Nairobi Press, 2009).

Google Scholar

Owuor, B. O., Mulemi, B. A. & Kokwaro, J. O. Indigenous snake bite remedies of the Luo of western Kenya. J. Ethnobiol. 25, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771(2005)25[129:ISBROT]2.0.CO;2 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Khalumba, M., Mbugua, P. & Kung'u, J. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings. 527–532.

Silva, M. M., Seneviratne, S. S., Weerakoon, D. K. & Goonasekara, C. L. Characterization of Daboia russelii and Naja naja venom neutralizing ability of an undocumented indigenous medication in Sri Lanka. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 8, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2016.10.001 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Wolverton, B. C., Johnson, A. & Bounds, K. Interior landscape plants for indoor air pollution abatement. in NTRS-NASA Technical Reports Server, Work Supported by the NASA Office of Commercial Programs-Technology Utilization Division, and the Associated Landscape Contractors of America (ALCA). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John C. Stennis Space Center, Science and Technology Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–6000 1/07/1989, 27 (1989).

Mirjankar, M. R. et al. Garlic and cilantro assisted phytoextraction of zinc using Sansevieria roxburghiana from contaminated soil. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 38, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102203 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Siswanto, D., Permana, B. H., Treesubsuntorn, C. & Thiravetyan, P. Sansevieria trifasciata and Chlorophytum comosum botanical biofilter for cigarette smoke phytoremediation in a pilot-scale experiment—Evaluation of multi-pollutant removal efficiency and CO2 emission. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 13, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00775-9 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, X. & Yang, Y. Preliminary study on Cd accumulation characteristics in Sansevieria trifasciata Prain. Plant Divers. 42, 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.05.001 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Fasanya, O. O. et al. Characterization of Sansevieria liberica & Urena lobata fibers as potential sorbent materials for crude oil clean up. J. Nat. Fibers 19, 1756–1771. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1788486 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kumar, I., Mondal, M., Meyappan, V. & Sakthivel, N. Green one-pot synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Sansevieria roxburghiana leaf extract for the catalytic degradation of toxic organic pollutants. Mater. Res. Bull. 117, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.04.029 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Thu, Z. M. et al. Structures and bioactivities of steroidal saponins isolated from the genera Dracaena and Sansevieria. Molecules 26, 1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071916 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Thu, Z. M., Myo, K. K., Aung, H. T., Armijos, C. & Vidari, G. Flavonoids and stilbenoids of the genera Dracaena and Sansevieria: Structures and bioactivities. Molecules 25, 2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112608 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Abdel-Rahman, R. F., Fayed, H. M., Ogaly, H. A., Hussein, R. A. & Raslan, M. Phytoconstituents of Sansevieria suffruticosa NE Br. Leaves and its hepatoprotective effect via activation of the NRF2/ARE signaling pathway in an experimentally induced liver fibrosis rat model. Chem. Biodivers. 19, e202100960. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202100960 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Males, J. Secrets of succulence. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2121–2134. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx096 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kumar, A., Sreedharan, S., Singh, P., Achigan-Dako, E. G. & Ramchiary, N. Improvement of a traditional orphan food crop, Portulaca oleracea L. (Purslane) using genomics for sustainable food security and climate-resilient agriculture. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 711820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.711820 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Stewart, J. R. Agave as a model CAM crop system for a warming and drying world. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00684 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, D. et al. Overexpression of an agave phospho enol pyruvate carboxylase improves plant growth and stress tolerance. Cell 10, 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10030582 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Batcho, A. A., Sarwar, M. B., Rashid, B., Hassan, S. & Husnain, T. Heat shock protein gene identified from Agave sisalana (AsHSP70) confers heat stress tolerance in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 33, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00200-6 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

De Souza, J. T. et al. Endophytic bacteria isolated from both healthy and diseased Agave sisalana plants are able to control the bole rot disease. Biol. Control 157, 104575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104575 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Eke, P. et al. Endophytic bacteria of desert cactus (Euphorbia trigonas Mill.) confer drought tolerance and induce growth promotion in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Microbiol. Res. 228, 126302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.126302 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, F. et al. Distinct endophytes are used by diverse plants for adaptation to karst regions. Sci. Rep. 9, 5246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41802-0 (2019).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, Q. & White, J. F. Bioprospecting desert plants for endophytic and biostimulant microbes: A strategy for enhancing agricultural production in a hotter. Drier Future Biol. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10100961 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Martinez-Rodriguez, A. et al. Seed Endophytes (eds. Verma, S., White Jr., J.). 139–170 (Springer, 2019).

García-Hernández, E. et al. Indirect organogenesis for high frequency shoot regeneration of two cultivars of Sansevieria trifasciata Prain differing in fiber production. Sci. Rep. 12, 8507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12640-4 (2022).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Treesubsuntorn, C., Boraphech, P. & Thiravetyan, P. Trimethylamine removal by plant capsule of Sansevieria kirkii in combination with Bacillus cereus EN1. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 24, 10139–10149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8679-0 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kaur, J. & Mudgal, G. An efficient and quick protocol for in vitro multiplication of snake plant, Sansevieria trifasciata var. Laurentii [Prain]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 147, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02132-0 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jasim, B., John Jimtha, C., Jyothis, M. & Radhakrishnan, E. K. Plant growth promoting potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from Piper nigrum. Plant Growth Regulat. 71, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-013-9802-y (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cappuccino, J. & Sherman, N. Microbiology, A Laboratory Manual. 188–247 (The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., 1992).

Kang, K. H. & Kim, J. K. Degradation characteristics of a novel multi-enzyme-possessing Bacillus licheniformis TK3-Y strain for the treatment of high-salinity fish wastes and green seaweeds. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 18, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.5657/FAS.2015.0349 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ghasemi, Y. et al. Screening and isolation of extracellular protease producing bacteria from the Maharloo Salt Lake. Iran. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 7, 175–180 (2011).

CAS Google Scholar

Bharadwaj, P. S. & Udupa, P. M. Isolation, purification and characterization of pectinase enzyme from Streptomyces thermocarboxydus. J. Clin. Microbiol. Biochem. Technol. 5, 001–006. https://doi.org/10.17352/jcmbt.000031 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Abd-Elhalem, B. T., El-Sawy, M., Gamal, R. F. & Abou-Taleb, K. A. Production of amylases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens under submerged fermentation using some agro-industrial by-products. Ann. Agricult. Sci. 60, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.06.001 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

PHE. Bacteriology, (Public Health England, Standards Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 2018).

Hudzicki, J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. https://asm.org/Protocols/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Pro (2009).

CLSI. Performance for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013).

Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. T. & Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28, 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017 (1956).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bramhachari, P. V. & Dubey, S. K. Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Vibrio harveyi strain VB23. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01967.x (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sirin, S. & Aslim, B. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria derived exopolysaccharides for use as a defined neuroprotective agent against amyloid beta1–42-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65147-1 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Saravanan, C. & Shetty, P. K. H. Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharide from Leuconostoc lactis KC117496 isolated from idli batter. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 90, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.007 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Watson, L. P., McKee, A. E. & Merrell, B. R. Preparation of microbiological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Scan. Electron Microsc. 2, 45–56 (1980).

Google Scholar

Basavand, E., Charkhabi, N. F., Khodaygan, P. & Rahimian, H. Agrobacterium pusense, a new plant tumour-inducing pathogen isolated from Lawson cypress. Forest Pathol. 51, e12655. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12655 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Nautiyal, C. S. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x (1999).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. The colorimetric determiation of phosphorus. J. Biol. Chem. 66, 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84756-1 (1925).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, L. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39–46 (1945).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Dworkin, M. & Foster, J. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J. Bacteriol. 75, 592. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.75.5.592-603.1958 (1958).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cabaj, A. & Kosakowska, A. Iron-dependent growth of and siderophore production by two heterotrophic bacteria isolated from brackish water of the southern Baltic Sea. Microbiol. Res. 164, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2007.07.001 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hu, Q. & Xu, J. A simple double-layered chrome azurol S agar (SD-CASA) plate assay to optimize the production of siderophores by a potential biocontrol agent Bacillus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5, 4321–4327. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.238 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Arora, N. K. & Verma, M. Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria. 3 Biotech 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-1008-y (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Payne, S. M. Iron acquisition in microbial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 1, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-842X(93)90036-Q (1993).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bent, E., Tuzun, S., Chanway, C. P. & Enebak, S. J. C. Alterations in plant growth and in root hormone levels of lodgepole pines inoculated with rhizobacteria. J. Microbiol. 47, 793–800 (2001).

CAS Google Scholar

Gordon, S. A. & Weber, R. P. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 26, 192. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.26.1.192 (1951).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Borrow, A. et al. Gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus Gibberella fujikuroi: Some observations on its production and isolation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 6, 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740060609 (1955).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Saravanan, V. S., Subramoniam, S. R. & Raj, S. A. Assessing in vitro solubilization potential of different zinc solubilizing bacterial (ZSB) isolates. Braz. J. Microbiol. 35, 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822004000100020 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Prajapati, K. & Modi, H. Isolation and characterization of potassium solubilizing bacteria from ceramic industry soil. CIBTech J. Microbiol. 1, 8–14 (2012).

Google Scholar

Pandey, P. K., Samanta, R. & Yadav, R. N. S. Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria from the ethnomedicinal Mussaenda roxburghii (Akshap) of Eastern Himalayan Province, India. Adv. Biol. 1–8, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/580510 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lorck, H. Production of hydrocyanic acid by bacteria. Physiol. Plant. 1, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1948.tb07118.x (1948).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sultan, A. & Nabiel, Y. Tube method and Congo red agar versus tissue culture plate method for detection of biofilm production by uropathogens isolated from midstream urine: Which one could be better?. Afr. J. Clin. Exp. Microbiol. 20, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v20i1.9 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Qayyum, A., Razzaq, A., Ahmad, M. & Jenks, M. A. Water stress causes differential effects on germination indices, total soluble sugar and proline content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 14038–14045. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2220 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wellburn, A. R. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 144, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2 (1994).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tariq, U., Ali, M. & Abbasi, B. H. Morphogenic and biochemical variations under different spectral lights in callus cultures of Artemisia absinthium L. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 130, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.11.026 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kamtekar, S., Keer, V. & Patil, V. Estimation of phenolic content, flavonoid content, antioxidant and alpha amylase inhibitory activity of marketed polyherbal formulation. J. Appl. Pharmaceut. Sci. 4, 61. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2014.40911 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Wright, E. S., Yilmaz, L. S. & Noguera, D. R. DECIPHER, a search-based approach to chimera identification for 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06516-11 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Khan, A. L., Shahzad, R., Al-Harrasi, A. & Lee, I.-J. Endophytes: Crop Productivity and Protection (eds. Maheshwari, D.K. & Annapurna, K.). Vol. 2. 95–110 (Springer, 2017).

Venieraki, A., Tsalgatidou, P. C., Georgakopoulos, D., Dimou, M. & Katinakis, P. Swarming motility in plant-associated bacteria. Hellenic Plant Protect. J. 9, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/hppj-2016-0002 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

West, T. P. Production of the polysaccharide curdlan by Agrobacterium species on processing coproducts and plant lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Fermentation 6, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6010016 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jindal, N., Khattar, J. S. & Singh, D. P. Polysaccharides of Microbial Origin: Biomedical Applications (eds. Oliveira, J., Radhouani, H. & Reis, R.L.). 1–14 (Springer, 2020).

Be’er, A. & Harshey, R. M. Collective motion of surfactant-producing bacteria imparts superdiffusivity to their upper surface. Biophys. J. 101, 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.019 (2011).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Hao, L.-Y., Willis, D. K., Andrews-Polymenis, H., McClelland, M. & Barak, J. D. Requirement of siderophore biosynthesis for plant colonization by Salmonella enterica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 4561–4570. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07867-11 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Wheatley, R. M. & Poole, P. S. Mechanisms of bacterial attachment to roots. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42, 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy014 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sheppard, D. C. & Howell, P. L. Biofilm exopolysaccharides of pathogenic fungi: Lessons from bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 12529–12537. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R116.720995 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Osemwegie, O. O. et al. Exopolysaccharides from bacteria and fungi: Current status and perspectives in Africa. Heliyon 6, e04205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04205 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Xu, L. et al. Identification of substituent groups and related genes involved in salecan biosynthesis in Agrobacterium sp. ZX09. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101, 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7814-z (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zannini, E., Waters, D. M., Coffey, A. & Arendt, E. K. Production, properties, and industrial food application of lactic acid bacteria-derived exopolysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7172-2 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xiu, A. et al. The chemical and digestive properties of a soluble glucan from Agrobacterium sp. ZX09. Carbohyd. Polym. 82, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.027 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kavita, K., Singh, V. K., Mishra, A. & Jha, B. Characterisation and anti-biofilm activity of extracellular polymeric substances from Oceanobacillus iheyensis. Carbohyd. Polym. 101, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.099 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Iyer, A., Mody, K. & Jha, B. NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository. 467–471 (2005).

Wang, H., Ding, S., Wang, G., Xu, X. & Zhou, G. In situ characterization and analysis of Salmonella biofilm formation under meat processing environments using a combined microscopic and spectroscopic approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 167, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.10.005 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Freitas, F. et al. Emulsifying behaviour and rheological properties of the extracellular polysaccharide produced by Pseudomonas oleovorans grown on glycerol byproduct. Carbohyd. Polym. 78, 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.05.016 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

San-Blas, E., Cubillán, N., Guerra, M., Portillo, E. & Esteves, I. Characterization of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria by Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflection (FT-IR/ATR). Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 93, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.03.006 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Nouha, K., Hoang, N. & Tyagi, R. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry study of extracellular polymer substances produced on secondary sludge fortified with crude glycerol. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 5, 2169–0022.1000240. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0022.1000240 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ye, L. et al. Structural characterisation of a heteropolysaccharide by NMR spectra. Food Chem. 112, 962–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.017 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yu, L. et al. Preparation and partial structural characterization of the exopolysaccharide from Bacillus mucilaginosus SM-01. Carbohyd. Polym. 146, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.038 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Karbowiak, T., Ferret, E., Debeaufort, F., Voilley, A. & Cayot, P. Investigation of water transfer across thin layer biopolymer films by infrared spectroscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 370, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.037 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Banat, I. M. et al. Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2589-0 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wei, X. et al. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on Cd adsorption by bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 159, 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.006 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Donot, F., Fontana, A., Baccou, J. C. & Schorr-Galindo, S. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction. Carbohyd. Polym. 87, 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.083 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Boukhelata, N., Taguett, F. & Kaci, Y. Characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide produced by a Saharan bacterium Paenibacillus tarimensis REG 0201M. Ann. Microbiol. 69, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1406-3 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kalyanasundaram, G. T., Doble, M. & Gummadi, S. N. Production and downstream processing of (1→3)-β-d-glucan from mutant strain of Agrobacterium sp. ATCC 31750. AMB Exp. 2, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-31 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rafigh, S. M., Yazdi, A. V., Vossoughi, M., Safekordi, A. A. & Ardjmand, M. Optimization of culture medium and modeling of curdlan production from Paenibacillus polymyxa by RSM and ANN. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 70, 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.034 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Han, Y. et al. Rheological, emulsifying and thermostability properties of two exopolysaccharides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LPL061. Carbohyd. Polym. 115, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.044 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mao, R., Tang, J. & Swanson, B. Water holding capacity and microstructure of gellan gels. Carbohyd. Polym. 46, 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00337-4 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chu, F., Kearns, D. B., Branda, S. S., Kolter, R. & Losick, R. Targets of the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05019.x (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Romero, D., Aguilar, C., Losick, R. & Kolter, R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 2230–2234. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910560107 (2010).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Castellane, T. C., Persona, M. R., Campanharo, J. C. & de Macedo Lemos, E. G. Production of exopolysaccharide from rhizobia with potential biotechnological and bioremediation applications. Int. J Biol. Macromol. 74, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.007 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Vimala, P. & Lalithakumari, D. Characterization of exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by Leuconostoc sp. V 41. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. 5, 161–165 (2003).

CAS Google Scholar

Kumar, C. G., Joo, H.-S., Choi, J.-W., Koo, Y.-M. & Chang, C.-S. Purification and characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide from haloalkalophilic Bacillus sp. I-450. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 34, 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.03.001 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Aujoulat, F., Marchandin, H., Zorgniotti, I., Masnou, A. & Jumas-Bilak, E. Rhizobium pusense is the main human pathogen in the genus Agrobacterium/Rhizobium. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 21(472), e471-472.e475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.005 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Lingling, D. GRAS Notice for Beta-Glucan from Agrobacterium sp. ZX09 for Use in Select Food Categories. GRAS Notice (GRN) No. 961. https://www.fda.gov/food/generally-recognized-safe-gras/gras-notice-inventory. (Sichuan Synlight Biotech Co., Ltd. Chengnan Industrial Park Economic Development Area, 2020).

Shehata, H. R., Dumigan, C., Watts, S. & Raizada, M. N. An endophytic microbe from an unusual volcanic swamp corn seeks and inhabits root hair cells to extract rock phosphate. Sci. Rep. 7, 13479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14080-x (2017).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Soni, R., Yadav, S. K. & Rajput, A. S. Microorganisms for Green Revolution. Microbes for Sustainable Agro-Ecosystem (eds. Panpatte, D.G., Jhala, Y.K., Shelat, H.N., & Vyas, R.V.). 161–175 (Springer Singapore, 2018).

Sagar, A. et al. ACC deaminase and antioxidant enzymes producing halophilic Enterobacter sp PR14 promotes the growth of rice and millets under salinity stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 26, 1847–1854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00852-9 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Simarmata, R. & Dewi, D. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 012015 (IOP Publishing).

Niehus, R., Picot, A., Oliveira, N. M., Mitri, S. & Foster, K. R. The evolution of siderophore production as a competitive trait. Evolution 71, 1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13263 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

de Souza, R. et al. The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in southern Brazilian fields. Plant Soil 366, 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1430-1 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rodrigues, A. A., Forzani, M. V., Soares, R. D. S., Sibov, S. T. & Vieira, J. D. G. Isolation and selection of plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Trop. 46, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4639526 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Mia, M. A. B., Shamsuddin, Z. H., Wahab, Z. & Marziah, M. High-yielding and quality banana production through plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation. Fruits 60, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2005024 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Baliyan, N. et al. Optimization of gibberellic acid production in endophytic Bacillus cereus using response surface methodology and its use as plant growth regulator in chickpea. J. Plant Growth Regul. 41, 1–11 (2021).

Google Scholar

Bagci, S., Ekiz, H., Yilmaz, A. & Cakmak, I. Effects of zinc deficiency and drought on grain yield of field-grown wheat cultivars in central Anatolia. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00256.x (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Nitu, R., Rajinder, K. & Sukhminderjit, K. Zinc solubilizing bacteria to augment soil fertility—A comprehensive review. Int. J. Agricult. Sci. Vet. Med. 8, 38–44 (2020).

Google Scholar

Ashfaq, M., Hassan, H. M., Ghazali, A. H. A. & Ahmad, M. Halotolerant potassium solubilizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria may improve potassium availability under saline conditions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 192, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08655-x (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Meena, V. S. et al. Potassium solubilizing rhizobacteria (KSR): Isolation, identification, and K-release dynamics from waste mica. Ecol. Eng. 81, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.065 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Gothwal, R., Nigam, V., Mohan, M., Sasmal, D. & Ghosh, P. Screening of nitrogen fixers from rhizospheric bacterial isolates associated with important desert plants. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 6, 101–109 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Chandran, S. Isolation and characterization of N2 fixing bacteria from Curcuma rhizosphere soil of Western Ghats. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 6, 487–491 (2019).

Google Scholar

Voisard, C., Keel, C., Haas, D. & Dèfago, G. Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. EMBO J. 8, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03384.x (1989).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rijavec, T. & Lapanje, A. Hydrogen cyanide in the rhizosphere: Not suppressing plant pathogens, but rather regulating availability of phosphate. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01785 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Morcillo, R. J. L. & Manzanera, M. The effects of plant-associated bacterial exopolysaccharides on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Metabolites 11, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060337 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Haque, M. M. et al. Halotolerant biofilm-producing rhizobacteria mitigate seawater-induced salt stress and promote growth of tomato. Sci. Rep. 12, 5599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09519-9 (2022).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Gupta, G., Snehi, S. K. & Singh, V. Biofilms in Plant and Soil Health (ed. Ahmad, F.M.H.I.). 27–42 (Wiley, 2017).

Kimura, E., Bell, J., Trostle, C., Neely, C. & Drake, D. Potential Causes of Yellowing During the Tillering Stage of Wheat in Texas. (The Texas A&M University System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating, 2018).

Naseem, H., Ahsan, M., Shahid, M. A. & Khan, N. Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. J. Basic Microbiol. 58, 1009–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800309 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ilyas, N. et al. Exopolysaccharides producing bacteria for the amelioration of drought stress in wheat. Sustainability 12, 8876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218876 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chandran, H., Meena, M. & Swapnil, P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a green alternative for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 13, 10986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910986 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Basu, A. et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 13, 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Vessey, J. K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255, 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hamid, B. et al. Bacterial plant biostimulants: A sustainable way towards improving growth, productivity, and health of crops. Sustainability 13, 2856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052856 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sayyed, R. Z., Jamadar, D. D. & Patel, P. R. Production of exo-polysaccharide by Rhizobium sp. Indian J. Microbiol. 51, 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0115-4 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mbarki, S. et al. Salinity Responses and Tolerance in Plants. Vol. 1 (eds. Kumar, V., Wani, S., Suprasanna, P., Tran, L.S.). 85–136 (Springer, 2018).

Hare, P. D. & Cress, W. A. Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 21, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005703923347 (1997).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, Y. P. & Nan, Z. Growth and anti-oxidative systems changes in Elymus dahuricus is affected by Neotyphodium endophyte under contrasting water availability. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00279.x (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Huang, W.-Y., Cai, Y.-Z., Xing, J., Corke, H. & Sun, M. A potential antioxidant resource: endophytic fungi from medicinal plants. Econ. Bot. 61, 14–30 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Nakabayashi, R. et al. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 77, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12388 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Almuhayawi, M. S. et al. Bacterial endophytes as a promising approach to enhance the growth and accumulation of bioactive metabolites of three species of Chenopodium Sprouts. Plants 10, 2745. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122745 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gagné-Bourque, F., Bertrand, A., Claessens, A., Aliferis, K. A. & Jabaji, S. Alleviation of drought stress and metabolic changes in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) colonized with Bacillus subtilis B26. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00584 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Gahoonia, T. S., Care, D. & Nielsen, N. E. Root hairs and phosphorus acquisition of wheat and barley cultivars. Plant Soil 191, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004270201418 (1997).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bates, T. R. & Lynch, J. P. Root hairs confer a competitive advantage under low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 236, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012791706800 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Péret, B., Clément, M., Nussaume, L. & Desnos, T. Root developmental adaptation to phosphate starvation: Better safe than sorry. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.05.006 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Niu, Y. F. et al. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: A review. Ann. Bot. 112, 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs285 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dakora, F. & Phillips, D. Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020809400075 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Richardson, A. E., Barea, J.-M., McNeill, A. M. & Prigent-Combaret, C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321, 305–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9895-2 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sharma, S. B., Sayyed, R. Z., Trivedi, M. H. & Gobi, T. A. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Arcand, M. M. & Schneider, K. D. Plant-and microbial-based mechanisms to improve the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock: A review. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 78, 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0001-37652006000400013 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gulden, R. H. & Vessey, J. K. Penicillium bilaii inoculation increases root-hair production in field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80, 801–804. https://doi.org/10.4141/P99-171 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

López-Bucio, J. et al. Bacillus megaterium rhizobacteria promote growth and alter root-system architecture through an auxin-and ethylene-independent signaling mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-2-0207 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ruiz, S. et al. Significance of root hairs at the field scale-modelling root water and phosphorus uptake under different field conditions. Plant Soil 447, 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04308-2 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ma, Z., Walk, T. C., Marcus, A. & Lynch, J. P. Morphological synergism in root hair length, density, initiation and geometry for phosphorus acquisition in Arabidopsis thaliana: A modeling approach. Plant Soil 236, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012728819326 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bahmani, R., Kim, D. G., Kim, J. A. & Hwang, S. The density and length of root hairs are enhanced in response to cadmium and arsenic by modulating gene expressions involved in fate determination and morphogenesis of root hairs in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01763 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Dimkpa, C., Weinand, T. & Asch, F. Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1682–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

All authors wish to thank the University Institute of Biotechnology (UIBT), Chandigarh University (CU) for infrastructural support. The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/358), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India

Jaspreet Kaur, Gaurav Mudgal, Kartar Chand & Gajendra B. Singh

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11495, Saudi Arabia

Kahkashan Perveen & Najat A. Bukhari

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan, Birbhum, West Bengal, 731236, India

Sandip Debnath

Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Bannimantapa Road, Mysore, 570015, India

Thotegowdanapalya C. Mohan & Rajulu Charukesi

Stress Signaling to the Nucleus, CNRS-Institute of Molecular Biology of Plants, 12 Rue du General-Zimmer, 67000, Strasbourg, France

Gaurav Singh

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

G.M., K.P., N.A.B., S.D., T.C.M., and R.C. together with G.S. conceptualized the design of all the experiments. J.K. is a doctoral student at Chandigarh University who carried out the implementation of all experiments and along with G.M. wrote the whole manuscript. G.B.S. performed molecular phylogenetic analyses and refinements. K.C. helped with culture conditioning, photography, and recordkeeping and is supported by the DST-SERB core research grant (EMR/08222/AS) awarded to G.M. The authors also thank Mr. Jagtar Singh for technical assistance, especially during the COVID19 lockdowns. All authors proofread and reviewed the manuscript before submission.

Correspondence to Gaurav Mudgal.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Video 1.

Supplementary Video 2.

Supplementary Video 3.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Kaur, J., Mudgal, G., Chand, K. et al. An exopolysaccharide-producing novel Agrobacterium pusense strain JAS1 isolated from snake plant enhances plant growth and soil water retention. Sci Rep 12, 21330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25225-y

Download citation

Received: 13 May 2022

Accepted: 28 November 2022

Published: 09 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25225-y

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.